Bouma P, Sipkema P, Westerhof N
Laboratory for Physiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Am J Physiol. 1993 Mar;264(3 Pt 2):H715-21. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1993.264.3.H715.
During cardiac contraction coronary arterial inflow is impeded, whereas venous flow is augmented. These effects are assumed to be caused by diameter reductions of intramyocardial blood vessels. The reduction in vascular diameter (and thus vascular volume) during contraction increases coronary resistance and/or decreases back pressure so that flow decreases and the rate of change of volume results in a capacitive flow. The aim of this study was to estimate the contribution of capacitive flow to total coronary inflow impediment. Isolated blood-perfused (100 mmHg and constant), maximally vasodilated, ryanodine-pretreated rat hearts (n = 8) with intraventricular balloons were used. The coronary inflow impediment during isovolumic beats at a heart rate of 2-3 Hz (dynamic contractions) and during prolonged systoles obtained by fast pacing (static contractions, no capacitive flow impediment) were compared. Changing left ventricular balloon volume enabled us to vary left ventricular pressure and to relate systolic flow to systolic left ventricular pressure. We found that for the same contractility (expressed in terms of systolic pressure-volume relationship and maximal elastance) and same left ventricular pressure, the ratio of coronary inflow impediment in dynamic and static contractions is not significantly different from unity (P < 0.005). This implies that under our experimental conditions coronary inflow impediment in dynamic contractions is little affected by capacitive effects.
在心脏收缩期间,冠状动脉血流受到阻碍,而静脉血流增加。这些效应被认为是由心肌内血管直径减小所致。收缩期间血管直径的减小(以及由此导致的血管容积减小)会增加冠状动脉阻力和/或降低背压,从而使血流减少,容积变化率导致电容性血流。本研究的目的是评估电容性血流对冠状动脉总血流阻碍的贡献。使用了经离体血液灌注(100 mmHg且恒定)、最大程度血管舒张、经雷诺丁预处理的大鼠心脏(n = 8),这些心脏带有心室内球囊。比较了心率为2 - 3 Hz时等容搏动期间(动态收缩)以及快速起搏获得的延长收缩期期间(静态收缩,无电容性血流阻碍)的冠状动脉血流阻碍情况。改变左心室球囊容积使我们能够改变左心室压力,并将收缩期血流与收缩期左心室压力相关联。我们发现,对于相同的收缩性(以收缩压 - 容积关系和最大弹性表示)以及相同左心室压力,动态收缩和静态收缩中冠状动脉血流阻碍的比值与1无显著差异(P < 0.005)。这意味着在我们的实验条件下,动态收缩中的冠状动脉血流阻碍几乎不受电容性效应的影响。