Slyper A
Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA.
Med Hypotheses. 1995 Dec;45(6):523-8. doi: 10.1016/0306-9877(95)90234-1.
Human growth hormone in currently recommended dosage is effective in many short children, irrespective of their endogenous growth-hormone status. This suggests that present dosing is pharmacological rather than physiological. As for any drug, issues of safety should be of paramount concern. Reassuring short-term data with pharmacological dosing or long-term data with replacement dosing cannot guarantee the ultimate safety of this form of therapy. The risk of future malignancy should be of particular concern. Poorly growing children without classic (severe) growth-hormone deficiency constitute an increasing proportion of children treated with human growth hormone. There are no satisfactory criteria for the diagnosis of neurosecretory growth-hormone dysfunction. The closer to puberty these children are treated, the less likely it is that there will be benefits in terms of increased final height. Recommendations as to a 'safety first' approach to growth-hormone treatment are given. A multicentre controlled trial is urgently needed to establish the benefits of treating children with neurosecretory growth hormone dysfunction.
目前推荐剂量的人生长激素对许多身材矮小的儿童有效,无论其内源性生长激素水平如何。这表明目前的给药是药理作用而非生理作用。对于任何药物,安全性问题都应是首要关注的。药理给药的短期数据令人安心,或替代给药的长期数据都不能保证这种治疗方式的最终安全性。未来发生恶性肿瘤的风险应特别引起关注。没有典型(严重)生长激素缺乏的生长发育不良儿童在接受人生长激素治疗的儿童中所占比例越来越大。对于神经分泌性生长激素功能障碍,尚无令人满意的诊断标准。这些儿童开始治疗的时间越接近青春期,最终身高增加的获益可能性就越小。文中给出了关于生长激素治疗“安全第一”方法的建议。迫切需要进行一项多中心对照试验,以确定治疗神经分泌性生长激素功能障碍儿童的获益情况。