• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice.

作者信息

Albright J, de Guzman C, Acebo P, Paiva D, Faulkner M, Swanson J

机构信息

Summit Medical Center, Samuel Merritt College, Oakland, CA 94609, USA.

出版信息

Appl Nurs Res. 1996 Aug;9(3):139-43. doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(96)80254-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0897-1897(96)80254-0
PMID:8771859
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice.患者教育材料的可读性：对临床实践的影响。
Appl Nurs Res. 1996 Aug;9(3):139-43. doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(96)80254-0.
2
Evaluating the readability of patient education materials.评估患者教育材料的可读性。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 1996 Nov-Dec;21(6):273. doi: 10.1097/00005721-199611000-00011.
3
Readability of written materials: implications for critical care nurses.书面材料的可读性：对重症监护护士的影响
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1995 Nov-Dec;14(6):328-34.
4
Assessing the readability of your patient education materials. There's more to it than simply applying a formula.评估您的患者教育材料的可读性。这不仅仅是简单地应用一个公式。
Health Care Food Nutr Focus. 1997 Oct;14(2):6-8.
5
A descriptive study of the readability of patient information leaflets designed by nurses.一项关于护士所设计患者信息手册可读性的描述性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Nov;26(5):985-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00455.x.
6
Tips for improving patient education materials. The right readability level is one key to success.改进患者教育材料的小贴士。合适的可读性水平是成功的关键之一。
Health Care Food Nutr Focus. 1997 Oct;14(2):1, 3.
7
Readability of advance directive documents.
Image J Nurs Sch. 1997 Spring;29(1):53-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1997.tb01140.x.
8
Readability: an important issue impacting healthcare for women with postpartum depression.可读性：影响产后抑郁症女性医疗保健的一个重要问题。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2006 Nov-Dec;31(6):350-5. doi: 10.1097/00005721-200611000-00004.
9
Readability of printed educational materials used to inform potential and actual ostomates.
J Clin Nurs. 1996 Nov;5(6):359-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.1996.tb00268.x.
10
Developing and evaluating printed education materials: a prescriptive model for quality.开发与评估印刷版教育材料：质量规范模型
Orthop Nurs. 1993 Nov-Dec;12(6):39-46. doi: 10.1097/00006416-199311000-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to posthysterectomy questions posted to a public social media forum.比较医生和人工智能聊天机器人对发布在公共社交媒体论坛上的子宫切除术后问题的回答。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Aug 5;5(3):100553. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100553. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Patient Educational Materials for Pheochromocytoma Exceed Recommended Readability Level: An Analysis Across Three Independent Reading Instruments.嗜铬细胞瘤患者教育材料超出推荐的可读性水平：基于三种独立阅读工具的分析
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02666-3.
3
The role of large language models in improving the readability of orthopaedic spine patient educational material.
大语言模型在提高骨科脊柱患者教育材料可读性方面的作用。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 28;20(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05955-1.
4
Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of microsoft copilot artificial intelligence chatbot and google search in answering patient inquiries about infertility: evaluating readability, understandability, and actionability.微软Copilot人工智能聊天机器人与谷歌搜索在回答患者关于不孕症问题方面的有效性比较分析：评估可读性、可理解性和可操作性。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01056-z.
5
Readability of Orthopaedic Patient Educational Material: An artificial intelligence application.骨科患者教育材料的可读性：一项人工智能应用。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Mar 12;64:102971. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102971. eCollection 2025 May.
6
Evaluating if ChatGPT Can Answer Common Patient Questions Compared With OrthoInfo Regarding Rotator Cuff Tears.评估ChatGPT与OrthoInfo相比能否回答有关肩袖撕裂的常见患者问题。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Mar 11;9(3). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00289. eCollection 2025 Mar 1.
7
Readability of online and offline written health information: a protocol of a systematic review of systematic reviews.在线和离线书面健康信息的可读性：一项系统评价的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 23;14(12):e079756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079756.
8
A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the readability and quality of online resources regarding thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery.关于拇指腕掌关节置换手术的在线资源可读性和质量的横断面定量分析。
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 Jun 26;16(4):100119. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100119. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Arabic Health Information on Halitosis: Infodemiological Study.基于网络的口臭阿拉伯文健康信息质量和可读性评估：信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 28;26:e54072. doi: 10.2196/54072.
10
Best practices on patient education materials in hip surgery based on learnings from major hip centers and societies.基于主要髋关节中心和学会的经验教训制定的髋关节手术患者教育材料最佳实践。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024 Feb 29;11(2):144-149. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnae011. eCollection 2024 Jul.