Mumford M E
Freelance Clinical Research Associate, CEU, RAF Akrotiri.
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Nov;26(5):985-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00455.x.
Written patient information materials can be valuable communication tools for teaching and reinforcing the verbal message, especially in the present climate of today's health service where patients are in hospital for such short times. They are only useful if the patient is able to read and understand them, otherwise they become an expensive waste of resources. Various studies have shown that many healthcare information leaflets are written at university or postgraduate level and would cause problems with understanding for many people reading them. This study set out to examine the readability of nurse-designed written information leaflets using the Flesch Reading Ease score and the FOG and SMOG readability formulae. This descriptive study used a sample of 24 leaflets designed by trained nurses in a large teaching hospital. The results produced a mean grade of 11.3 with a range of 8.9 to 14.8. This was similar to the results of other studies and meant that patients may have difficulty comprehending the information. It would appear that little progress has been made in 40 years in this area and potential reasons are discussed. Advantages and disadvantages of readability formulae and other guidelines available for developing information leaflets are explored. Recommendations for further research are made.
书面患者信息材料对于传授和强化口头信息而言可能是很有价值的沟通工具,尤其是在当今医疗服务环境下,患者住院时间如此之短。只有当患者能够阅读并理解这些材料时,它们才有用,否则就会造成资源的浪费。各种研究表明,许多医疗保健信息手册是按照大学或研究生水平编写的,这会给许多阅读它们的人造成理解上的问题。本研究旨在使用弗莱什易读性分数以及FOG和SMOG易读性公式来检验护士设计的书面信息手册的易读性。这项描述性研究采用了一家大型教学医院中由受过培训的护士设计的24份手册作为样本。结果得出平均年级水平为11.3,范围在8.9至14.8之间。这与其他研究结果相似,意味着患者可能难以理解这些信息。在这一领域40年来似乎进展甚微,并对潜在原因进行了讨论。探讨了易读性公式以及可用于编写信息手册的其他指南的优缺点。提出了进一步研究的建议。