Early coronary angioplasty as compared with delayed coronary angioplasty in patients with high-risk unstable angina pectoris.

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) results in a higher complication rate in patients with unstable angina pectoris than in patients with stable angina. The current management approach is directed towards achieving stabilization by medical treatment in order to reduce the rate of major complications, but the value of a conservative strategy has not been proved by clinical trials, nor has the duration of therapy been established. On the other hand, the definition of unstable angina encompasses a heterogeneous spectrum of patients with different prognoses. It is more appropriate to stratify patients according to different risk in order to evaluate the results of different therapeutic strategies. The purpose of this study was the evaluation of the results of early and delayed coronary angioplasty in patients with high-risk unstable angina.

METHODS

We compared immediate and follow-up results of early and delayed coronary angioplasty in a series of 263 patients with high-risk unstable angina because of prolonged (more than 15 min) angina or early post-infarction angina at rest. Early PTCA (within 4 h of the last ischaemic episode) was performed in 110 patients with unstable angina refractory to maximized medical treatment, whereas 153 patients with stabilized angina underwent delayed PTCA (at more than 72 h and less than 1 week from the last ischaemic episode).

RESULTS

No significant differences between the two groups were found in primary lesion success rates (92.7% compared with 94.1%), major in-hospital adverse events such as reocclusion (5.4% compared with 2.6%), emergency coronary artery surgery (1.8% compared with 3.2%), myocardial infarction (3.6% compared with 2.6%) and death (1.8% compared with 0.7%). The rates of major adverse events during 6 months follow-up were similar in the two groups: recurrent ischaemia (13.4% compared with 19.7%), repeat coronary angioplasty (11.5% compared with 14.9%), coronary artery surgery (1.9% compared with 4.7%), myocardial infarction (0), and death (0).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that an aggressive coronary angioplasty strategy in patients with high-risk unstable angina may result in a favourable outcome both immediately and at 6 months' follow-up, The achievement of a stabilization period seems neither to improve the clinical success rates nor to reduce major cardiac event rates.