Mommaerts M Y, Beirne J C, Jacobs W I, Abeloos J S, De Clercq C A, Neyt L F
Division of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, General Hospital St-John, Bruges, Belgium.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1996 Apr;24(2):78-82. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(96)80016-3.
This prospective study investigates the long-term appearance of the scar following closure of lower blepharoplasty incisions with the fibrin adhesive Tissucol compared with the usual subciliary suturing. Eighteen eyelids closed with fibrin adhesive were compared with 12 eyelids where a 5-0 running suture was used for closure and to 10 eyelids that did not undergo surgery. The measurement team consisted of a panel, blind to patients and technique, that scored the scar morphology on a scale of 1-4. The Dunn test showed no difference between the group treated with the tissue adhesive and the group with conventional subciliary closure. There was a difference between the Tissucol treated group and the control group (P < 0.01). The surgical technique and the advantages in lower lid incision closure are discussed.
这项前瞻性研究调查了与传统的睫毛下缝合相比，使用纤维蛋白粘合剂Tissucol闭合下睑成形术切口后瘢痕的长期外观。将18只使用纤维蛋白粘合剂闭合的眼睑与12只使用5-0连续缝合闭合的眼睑以及10只未接受手术的眼睑进行比较。测量团队由一组对患者和技术不知情的人员组成，他们对瘢痕形态进行1-4分的评分。邓恩检验显示，使用组织粘合剂治疗的组与传统睫毛下闭合组之间没有差异。Tissucol治疗组与对照组之间存在差异（P<0.01）。文中讨论了手术技术以及下睑切口闭合的优势。
