Gillund B, Ferraro F R
Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks 58202-8380, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Jun;82(3 Pt 1):899-902. doi: 10.2466/pms.1996.82.3.899.
The current study investigated differences in allocation of attention between good and poor readers, using dual-task methodology. For 54 undergraduates classified as Good Readers and 54 classified as Poor Readers, based on their Nelson-Denny reading comprehension scores, significant main effects and interactions were found for word frequency, lexicality, and stimulus onset asynchrony, but no significant group differences (either in the form of main effects or interaction effects) were found between Good and Poor Readers. Possible explanations include task demands in the conditions and speed-accuracy trade-offs made by some subjects.
本研究采用双任务方法,调查了优秀阅读者和阅读能力较差者在注意力分配上的差异。根据尼尔森-丹尼阅读理解分数,将54名本科生归类为优秀阅读者,54名归类为阅读能力较差者,结果发现,在词频、词汇性和刺激呈现间隔方面存在显著的主效应和交互作用,但未发现优秀阅读者和阅读能力较差者之间存在显著的组间差异(无论是主效应还是交互效应形式)。可能的解释包括实验条件下的任务要求以及一些受试者所做的速度-准确性权衡。