Suppr超能文献

手部保暖对胰岛素敏感性测量的潜在混杂效应。

Potential confounding effect of hand-warming on the measurement of insulin sensitivity.

作者信息

Petrie J R, Ueda S, Morris A D, Elliott H L, Connell J M

机构信息

University Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, U.K.

出版信息

Clin Sci (Lond). 1996 Jul;91(1):65-71. doi: 10.1042/cs0910065.

Abstract
  1. Hand-warming is employed during metabolic studies to "arterialize' venous blood, but also has systemic haemodynamic effects. Study 1 aimed to determine if hand-warming affects the value for whole-body insulin sensitivity derived from the hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp technique. Study 2 was designed to assess the effect of hand-warming on contralateral forearm blood flow. 2. In study 1, eight healthy male subjects attended for four modified euglycaemic clamp studies, during which the right hand was placed in a heated-air hand box (55 degrees C), and the glucose infusion rate was adjusted according to blood samples from a cannula in either an ipsilateral dorsal hand vein or a contralateral antecubital vein with the box switched either on or off. In study 2, five healthy subjects attended two study days when the effect of 2 h of hand-warming (or control) on contralateral forewarm blood flow was measured. 3. Study 1; when clamps were performed according to samples taken from the contralateral antecubital vein, insulin sensitivity values were significantly lower during box-on versus box-off clamps (mean +/- SD 10.2 +/- 3.0 versus 13.0 +/- 3.8 mg min-1 kg-1, P < 0.05, 95% confidence interval -0.2, -5.3). When clamps were performed according to samples taken from the ipsilateral hand, there was no difference in insulin sensitivity during box-on versus box-off clamps (9.2 +/- 2.1 versus 9.0 +/- 1.7 mg min-1 kg-1, P not significant, 95% confidence interval -0.5, +0.9). There was a mean increase in heart rate of 6 beats/min in the box-on conditions (P < 0.05, analysis of variance). Study 2; forearm blood flow in the contralateral arm during hand-warming was significantly higher than in the control condition (P < 0.05, analysis of variance), although heart rate was similar on both study days. 4. Hand-warming had a detectable effect on insulin sensitivity when clamps were performed according to samples withdrawn from the contralateral arm, but no measurable effect when clamps were performed in the conventional manner. In addition, hand-warming increased heart rate during hyperinsulinaemia and contralateral FBF under basal conditions. These findings raise concern about unwanted (potentially confounding) systemic haemodynamic effects of hand-warming on the measurement of insulin sensitivity and insulin-mediated vasodilation.
摘要
  1. 在代谢研究中采用手部加热来使静脉血“动脉化”,但它也具有全身血流动力学效应。研究1旨在确定手部加热是否会影响通过高胰岛素正常血糖钳夹技术得出的全身胰岛素敏感性值。研究2旨在评估手部加热对另一侧前臂血流的影响。2. 在研究1中,8名健康男性受试者参与了4次改良的正常血糖钳夹研究,在此期间,将右手置于热空气手部箱(55摄氏度)中,根据同侧手背静脉或对侧肘前静脉插管采集的血样,在手部箱开启或关闭的情况下调整葡萄糖输注速率。在研究2中,5名健康受试者参与了两个研究日,测量了2小时手部加热(或对照)对另一侧前臂血流的影响。3. 研究1;当根据对侧肘前静脉采集的样本进行钳夹时,手部箱开启时的胰岛素敏感性值显著低于关闭时(平均值±标准差 10.2±3.0 与 13.0±3.8 mg min⁻¹ kg⁻¹,P<0.05,95%置信区间 -0.2,-5.3)。当根据同侧手部采集的样本进行钳夹时,手部箱开启与关闭时的胰岛素敏感性无差异(9.2±2.1 与 9.0±1.7 mg min⁻¹ kg⁻¹,P不显著,95%置信区间 -0.5,+0.9)。在手部箱开启的情况下,心率平均增加6次/分钟(P<0.05,方差分析)。研究2;手部加热期间对侧手臂的前臂血流显著高于对照情况(P<0.05,方差分析),尽管两个研究日的心率相似。4. 当根据从对侧手臂抽取的样本进行钳夹时,手部加热对胰岛素敏感性有可检测到的影响,但以传统方式进行钳夹时则无明显影响。此外,手部加热在高胰岛素血症期间增加心率,并在基础条件下增加对侧前臂血流。这些发现引发了对手部加热对胰岛素敏感性测量和胰岛素介导的血管舒张产生不必要(潜在混淆)的全身血流动力学效应的担忧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验