• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人指神经损伤的结果。

Outcome of digital nerve injuries in adults.

作者信息

Wang W Z, Crain G M, Baylis W, Tsai T M

机构信息

Christine M. Kleinert Institute for Hand and Micro Surgery, Louisville, KY, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 1996 Jan;21(1):138-43. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80167-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80167-5
PMID:8775209
Abstract

Evaluations of 67 adults with 90 complete digital nerve injuries were made more than 1 year after surgery. Moving and static two-point discrimination was determined on both lateral aspects of the injured and contralateral uninjured digits. Digits with primary repairs in mild crush or saw injuries had significantly worse two-point discrimination compared with digits that had a primary repair of a simple laceration. Furthermore, in mild crush injuries, digits with primary grafting had significantly better results than those with primary repair. Patients under 40 years of age had better two-point discrimination than those over 40. Some overlap innervation from the uninjured side was noted in two of eight digits tested, since sensation of the injured side was completely lost when the uninjured nerve of that digit was anesthetized. These results support the hypothesis that better recovery is obtained if tension is avoided at the nerve repair site in mild crush or saw injuries.

摘要

对67例患有90处完全性指神经损伤的成年人在术后1年多进行了评估。对受伤手指和对侧未受伤手指的两侧均测定了动态和静态两点辨别觉。与单纯裂伤一期修复的手指相比,轻度挤压伤或锯伤一期修复的手指两点辨别觉明显更差。此外,在轻度挤压伤中,一期移植的手指比一期修复的手指效果明显更好。40岁以下的患者两点辨别觉比40岁以上的患者更好。在测试的8个手指中有2个发现了来自未受伤侧的一些重叠神经支配,因为当该手指的未受伤神经被麻醉时,受伤侧的感觉完全丧失。这些结果支持这样一种假设,即在轻度挤压伤或锯伤中,如果在神经修复部位避免张力,可获得更好的恢复。

相似文献

1
Outcome of digital nerve injuries in adults.成人指神经损伤的结果。
J Hand Surg Am. 1996 Jan;21(1):138-43. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80167-5.
2
A randomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans.聚乙醇酸导管用于人类指神经重建的随机前瞻性研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Oct;106(5):1036-45; discussion 1046-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200010000-00013.
3
Crossover innervation after digital nerve injury: myth or reality?指神经损伤后的交叉神经支配:神话还是现实?
Ann Plast Surg. 2000 Nov;45(5):509-14. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200045050-00007.
4
Results of primary nerve repair in the upper extremity.
Microsurgery. 1989;10(2):147-50. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920100218.
5
Limited, protected postsurgical motion does not affect the results of digital nerve repair.术后有限的、受保护的活动不会影响指神经修复的效果。
J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Mar;29(2):302-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.11.007.
6
Clinical assessment of primary digital nerve repair.
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1995 Jun;264:45-7. doi: 10.3109/17453679509157166.
7
Recovery of sensibility after digital neurorrhaphy: a clinical investigation of prognostic factors.指神经缝合术后感觉功能的恢复:预后因素的临床研究
Ann Plast Surg. 2000 Jun;44(6):610-7. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200044060-00006.
8
[Return of sensitivity after digital nerve reconstruction in children: how does age affect outcome?].[儿童指神经重建后感觉功能的恢复:年龄如何影响预后?]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2013 Oct;45(5):265-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1355425. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
9
Sensory recovery after primary repair of palmar digital nerves using a Revolnerv(®) collagen conduit: a prospective series of 27 cases.使用Revolnerv(®)胶原蛋白导管对掌侧指神经进行一期修复后的感觉恢复:27例前瞻性系列研究。
Chir Main. 2014 Sep;33(4):279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.main.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
10
[Return of static and moving 2-point discrimination following nerve reconstruction].[神经重建后静态和动态两点辨别觉的恢复]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1989 Nov;21(6):299-301.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological Aspects of Nerve Gap Reconstruction: Addressing Patient Perspectives and Expectations.神经间隙重建的心理学方面:关注患者的观点和期望。
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Feb 17;6(5):760-765. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.01.010. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Comparative Effectiveness Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Peripheral Nerve Repair Using Direct Repair and Connector-assisted Repair.使用直接修复和连接器辅助修复进行周围神经修复的比较有效性系统评价和荟萃分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jul 9;12(7):e5927. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005927. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Treatment options for digital nerve injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
数字神经损伤的治疗选择:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 12;18(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04076-x.
4
Evaluation of Processed Nerve Allograft in Peripheral Nerve Surgery: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.周围神经手术中处理过的同种异体神经移植评估:系统评价与批判性评估
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jun 27;11(6):e5088. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005088. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Cold sensitivity, functional disability and predicting factors after a repaired digital nerve injury.修复指神经损伤后感觉冷敏、功能障碍及其预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 22;12(1):4847. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08926-2.
6
Scalpel edge roughness affects post-transection peripheral nerve regeneration.手术刀边缘粗糙度影响横断后周围神经再生。
Surg Open Sci. 2020 Nov 18;4:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2020.11.002. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Safety and efficacy of a nerve matrix membrane as a collagen nerve wrapping: a randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial.神经基质膜作为胶原神经包裹物的安全性和有效性:一项随机、单盲、多中心临床试验。
Neural Regen Res. 2021 Aug;16(8):1652-1659. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.303040.
8
Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review.成人指神经损伤手术修复的结果:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e025443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025443.
9
Conduit-based Nerve Repairs Provide Greater Resistance to Tension Compared with Primary Repairs: A Biomechanical Analysis on Large Animal Samples.与一期修复相比,基于导管的神经修复对张力具有更大的抵抗力:对大型动物样本的生物力学分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Dec 17;6(12):e1981. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001981. eCollection 2018 Dec.
10
Increasing Nerve Autograft Length Increases Senescence and Reduces Regeneration.增加神经自体移植长度会增加衰老并减少再生。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Oct;142(4):952-961. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004759.