Am J Prev Med. 1995 Nov-Dec;11(6 Suppl):58-73.
In 1993, the U.S. Public Health Service, with the assistance of the Public Health Foundation (PHF), launched a pilot study to develop state and national expenditure estimates for the core functions of public health. The core public health functions selected for the data collection effort were (1) health-related data, surveillance, and outcomes monitoring; (2) investigation and control of diseases, injuries, and response to natural disasters; (3) immunizations, family planning, and STD and TB clinical services; (4) protection of environment, housing, food, water, and the workplace; (5) laboratory services; (6) public information and education and community mobilization; (7) targeted outreach and linkage to personal services; (8) accountability/quality assurance; (9) training and education; and (10) leadership, planning, policy development, and administration. State health officials from Connecticut, Iowa, Missouri, Oregon, and Rhode Island helped develop a methodology and a set of guidelines for estimating expenditures on core functions and used this methodology to report expenditure data. Three additional states--Illinois, New York, and Texas--joined in a second phase of the pilot study, one that included collecting data on personal health services and total agency expenditure data. The eight states' combined per capita core function expenditures were $44 in fiscal year (FY) 1993. This included expenditures by state and local public health agencies and state substance abuse, mental health, and environmental health agencies. Expenditures for core public health functions accounted for 27% of these agencies' total expenditures. The largest core function expenditure accounting for approximately 30% of the total was for the protection of environment, housing, food, water, and the workplace. Extrapolating the eight states' expenditure estimates to the national level, spending for core public health functions in FY 1993 totaled $11.4 billion, or 1.3% of total U.S. health spending. The pilot project demonstrates that with appropriate guidance, including an estimating methodology and uniform definitions, categorical program data can be reported by function. The results of the data collection effort also demonstrate the potential utility of examining expenditures by core functions for state planning and policy making. The methodology allows states to distinguish core functions from other responsibilities, providing states with quantified information useful for reform efforts.
1993年,美国公共卫生服务局在公共卫生基金会(PHF)的协助下,开展了一项试点研究,以制定州和全国公共卫生核心职能的支出估算。为数据收集工作选定的公共卫生核心职能包括:(1)与健康相关的数据、监测及结果监测;(2)疾病、伤害调查与控制以及自然灾害应对;(3)免疫接种、计划生育以及性传播疾病和结核病临床服务;(4)环境保护、住房、食品、水及工作场所;(5)实验室服务;(6)公共信息与教育以及社区动员;(7)有针对性的外展及与个人服务的联系;(8)问责/质量保证;(9)培训与教育;(10)领导、规划、政策制定及管理。来自康涅狄格州、爱荷华州、密苏里州、俄勒冈州和罗德岛州的州卫生官员协助制定了估算核心职能支出的方法和一套指南,并使用该方法报告支出数据。另外三个州——伊利诺伊州、纽约州和得克萨斯州——加入了试点研究的第二阶段,该阶段包括收集个人卫生服务数据和机构总支出数据。1993财年,这八个州的人均核心职能支出合计为44美元。这包括州和地方公共卫生机构以及州药物滥用、心理健康和环境卫生机构的支出。公共卫生核心职能的支出占这些机构总支出的27%。最大的核心职能支出约占总支出的30%,用于环境保护、住房、食品、水及工作场所。将这八个州的支出估算推算至全国水平,1993财年公共卫生核心职能的支出总计114亿美元,占美国卫生总支出的1.3%。该试点项目表明,在包括估算方法和统一定义在内的适当指导下,可以按职能报告分类项目数据。数据收集工作的结果还表明,按核心职能审查支出对于州规划和政策制定具有潜在效用。该方法使各州能够区分核心职能与其他职责,为各州提供对改革努力有用的量化信息。