• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Minimally invasive vasectomy.

作者信息

Holt B A, Higgins A F

机构信息

Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Huntingdon, UK.

出版信息

Br J Urol. 1996 Apr;77(4):585-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.95119.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.95119.x
PMID:8777623
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the associated morbidity and patient comfort of the 'minimally invasive, no scalpel' (MINS) vasectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-nine consecutive patients presenting for vasectomy underwent a MINS procedure. Post-operatively, the pain experienced, recovery time and complication rate were assessed using a postal questionnaire. The questionnaire was also used to assess a group of historical controls who had undergone a vasectomy using a standard technique.

RESULTS

The length of time to recovery was significantly reduced in patients who underwent the MINS vasectomy (P < 0.05) and the pain, bruising, swelling and complication rate were also less than in patients who underwent a standard vasectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The MINS vasectomy is preferable to a standard technique, reducing both patient morbidity and the complication rate. This is attributable to the minimal dissection and reduced tissue handling required to expose and isolate the vas.

摘要

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive vasectomy.
Br J Urol. 1996 Apr;77(4):585-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.95119.x.
2
Conventional or Li vasectomy: a questionnaire study.传统输精管切除术或利多卡因输精管切除术:一项问卷调查研究。
Br J Urol. 1997 Apr;79(4):596-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00390.x.
3
Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (percutaneous vasectomy)--a comparative study against the standard no-scalpel vasectomy.简易改良无刀输精管结扎术(经皮输精管结扎术)——与标准无刀输精管结扎术的对比研究
Contraception. 2005 Feb;71(2):153-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.07.018.
4
A novel instrument-independent no-scalpel vasectomy - a comparative study against the standard instrument-dependent no-scalpel vasectomy.一种新型的非器械依赖型无刀输精管切除术——与标准器械依赖型无刀输精管切除术的对比研究。
Int J Androl. 2004 Aug;27(4):222-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2004.00475.x.
5
Comparison of Marie Stopes scalpel and electrocautery no-scalpel vasectomy techniques.玛丽斯特普斯手术刀与电灼无刀输精管结扎术技术的比较。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2003 Apr;29(2):32-4. doi: 10.1783/147118903101197214.
6
No-scalpel vasectomy at the King's birthday vasectomy festival.在国王生日输精管结扎节进行的无刀输精管结扎术。
Lancet. 1990 Apr 14;335(8694):894-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90487-p.
7
No-scalpel vasectomy outside China.中国境外的非手术刀输精管切除术。
Asian J Androl. 2000 Mar;2(1):21-4.
8
A minimally invasive vasectomy with the no suture, inline method for vas occlusion.一种采用无缝合、内置式输精管闭塞方法的微创输精管切除术。
Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;46(5):257-64.
9
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.输精管结扎术的手术刀切口与无手术刀切口对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD004112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub2.
10
A comparative study of the no scalpel and standard incision approaches to vasectomy in 5 countries. The Male Sterilization Investigator Team.5个国家无手术刀与标准切口输精管切除术方法的比较研究。男性绝育研究团队。
J Urol. 1999 Nov;162(5):1621-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive vas surgery using a newly designed double-ringed clamp.微创血管手术中使用新型双环夹。
World J Urol. 2010 Apr;28(2):205-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0437-6. Epub 2009 Jun 19.
2
Vasectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review.输精管切除术手术技术:一项系统评价。
BMC Med. 2004 May 24;2:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-21.
3
[Vasectomy today: a review of 1,275 vasectomies in 10 years].[今日输精管切除术:十年间1275例输精管切除术回顾]
Urologe A. 2003 Jul;42(7):933-9. doi: 10.1007/s00120-003-0301-z. Epub 2003 Feb 18.