Vingerhoets A J, Ratliff-Crain J, Jabaaij L, Tilders F J, Moleman P, Menges L J
Department of Medical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Psychosom Res. 1996 Feb;40(2):191-203. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(95)00528-5.
The present study examined resting endocrinological functioning and endocrine responsivity to new challenges as a function of self-reported stress load and symptomatology. Following a baseline period, four groups of male subjects (low-load/low-symptoms; low-load/high-symptoms; high-load/low-symptoms; high-load/high-symptoms) were exposed to stressful films, followed by a rest period. Blood samples were drawn after each film and after the rest condition, and urinary samples were collected during two nights preceding the experimental session. Neuroendocrine variables measured in plasma included adrenaline, noradrenaline, ACTH, cortisol, growth hormone, prolactin, and testosterone. The urinary samples were assayed for noradrenaline and adrenaline (in relation to creatinin). High-symptom subjects had significantly higher plasma levels of noradrenaline and overnight urinary adrenaline levels, whereas their cortisol levels tended to be lower as compared to the low-symptom group. The plasma noradrenaline/cortisol ratio was higher among the high-symptom subjects. However, upon controlling for neuroticism and life style factors (smoking and alcohol consumption), all but the effects on cortisol failed to meet significance criteria. Higher stress load was associated with higher plasma adrenaline responses during the laboratory session, irrespective of neuroticism or life-style measures. These results therefore suggest that in addition to measuring exposure to real-life stressors, it is also necessary to measure outcomes, such as symptoms, and to be aware of the effects of neuroticism and life-style when attempting to understand which specific psychosocial factors effect psychoendocrinological functioning.