Cairns J, Shackley P, Hundley V
Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Scotland.
Med Decis Making. 1996 Apr-Jun;16(2):161-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600208.
This paper outlines a model for valuing the benefits of antenatal screening based on the analysis of individual decision making with respect to consequent diagnostic testing. Central to the model is the idea that the benefits of screening can be measured by valuing the improved information generated from screening. The model is developed in the context of antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF). Benefits are assessed by surveying women in the general population in order to establish their preferences for two alternative methods of CF carrier screening-stepwise and couple screening. Preferences are elicited using standard-gamble questions in which women from a population-based random sample are asked to trade off risk of fetal loss with improved information from diagnostic testing. A series of standard-gamble questions is employed to elicit utility values for each of the possible information outcomes from screening. The expected utilities of both screening methods are calculated at both individual and group levels. The results suggest that the use of individual decision making with respect to diagnostic testing as a means of valuing the benefits of screening may have wide applications.
本文概述了一种基于对后续诊断检测的个体决策分析来评估产前筛查益处的模型。该模型的核心观点是,筛查的益处可以通过评估筛查产生的改善信息来衡量。该模型是在针对囊性纤维化(CF)的产前携带者筛查背景下开发的。通过对普通人群中的女性进行调查来评估益处,以确定她们对两种CF携带者筛查替代方法——逐步筛查和夫妇筛查的偏好。使用标准博弈问题来引出偏好,在这些问题中,来自基于人群的随机样本的女性被要求在胎儿丢失风险与诊断检测改善信息之间进行权衡。采用一系列标准博弈问题来引出筛查每种可能信息结果的效用值。在个体和群体层面计算两种筛查方法的预期效用。结果表明,将针对诊断检测的个体决策作为评估筛查益处的一种手段可能具有广泛的应用。