Siller T A, Dickson J H, Erwin W D
Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Apr 1;21(7):848-52. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199604010-00015.
One hundred five patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion with predeposited autologous blood, with or without intraoperative autologous transfusion, were reviewed.
To determine the benefit/nonbenefit of intraoperative autologous transfusion in diminishing the need for homologous blood and influencing post-operative hematocrit values in healthy adolescents undergoing spinal fusion for scoliosis.
A steady increase in the use of intraoperative autologous transfusion in recent years has occurred without guidelines regarding which procedures and patient populations would be best served. Previous studies have failed to determine the cost effectiveness and actual reduction in homologous blood exposure attributable to intraoperative autologous transfusion in adolescents who have undergone preoperative phlebotomy.
Fifty-five adolescents (intraoperative autologous transfusion group) who underwent posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis with the use of an intraoperative autologous transfusion device were compared to 50 patients (control group) who underwent the same procedure without the intraoperative autologous transfusion device.
The average percent salvage of red blood cells by the intraoperative autologous transfusion device was 35%. The control group utilized significantly more of the predonated autologous blood than the intraoperative autologous transfusion group (1.34 units/case vs. 1.78 units/case, P < 0.05). Homologous blood usage was the same in both groups. Two patients in the intraoperative autologous transfusion group required nondirected homologous blood (total of four units), compared to three patients in the control group (total of four units) (P = 0.048). Using multiple regression analysis, the total number of transfusions was significantly correlated with the estimated blood loss and the duration of surgery in both groups. Postoperative hematocrit levels were slightly higher in the control group, but there was not a significant difference.
The addition of intraoperative autologous transfusion to a preoperative phlebotomy program had no benefit on homologous blood exposure or post-operative hematocrit changes in this population. Blood requirements for this procedure can be met less expensively and more reliably by merely donating one's own blood.
回顾了105例接受后路脊柱内固定融合术并使用预存自体血的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者,这些患者术中或未进行自体输血。
确定术中自体输血在减少健康青少年脊柱侧凸融合手术中对异体血的需求以及影响术后血细胞比容值方面的利弊。
近年来,术中自体输血的使用稳步增加,但对于哪些手术和患者群体最适合使用该技术尚无指导原则。先前的研究未能确定术前进行静脉放血的青少年术中自体输血的成本效益以及实际减少异体血暴露的情况。
将55例使用术中自体输血装置进行特发性脊柱侧凸后路内固定融合术的青少年(术中自体输血组)与50例未使用术中自体输血装置进行相同手术的患者(对照组)进行比较。
术中自体输血装置回收红细胞的平均百分比为35%。对照组使用的预存自体血明显多于术中自体输血组(1.34单位/例对1.78单位/例,P<0.05)。两组异体血使用量相同。术中自体输血组有2例患者需要非定向异体血(共4单位),而对照组有3例患者(共4单位)(P = 0.048)。使用多元回归分析,两组的输血总量均与估计失血量和手术时间显著相关。对照组术后血细胞比容水平略高,但无显著差异。
在术前静脉放血方案中增加术中自体输血对该人群的异体血暴露或术后血细胞比容变化没有益处。仅通过自身献血就能更经济可靠地满足该手术的用血需求。