Mion L C, Minnick A, Palmer R
Department of Nursing Education and Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195, USA.
Milbank Q. 1996;74(3):411-33.
Although the use of physical restraint has declined in nursing homes, the practice remains widespread in hospitals. The use of physical restraint in hospitals was reviewed to identify the current clinical, legal, and ethical issues and the implications for policy and further research. Clinicians use physical restraints to prevent patient falls, to forestall disruption of therapy, or to control disruptive behavior, but they vary in how they determine to institute these restraints. The evidence to support the reasons for their determinations is not compelling. Fear of litigation remains a powerful motivator. The ethical dilemma of autonomy versus beneficence has not been resolved satisfactorily for patients in this setting. The lack of large-scale studies in any of these areas makes it difficult for policy makers to determine whether it is necessary to address hospital physical restraint practices through additional regulation.
尽管养老院中身体约束的使用有所减少,但这种做法在医院中仍然普遍存在。对医院中身体约束的使用情况进行了审查,以确定当前的临床、法律和伦理问题,以及对政策和进一步研究的影响。临床医生使用身体约束来防止患者跌倒、防止治疗中断或控制破坏性行为,但他们在决定实施这些约束的方式上存在差异。支持他们做出决定的理由的证据并不充分。对诉讼的恐惧仍然是一个强大的动机。在这种情况下,自主权与行善之间的伦理困境尚未得到令人满意的解决。这些领域缺乏大规模研究,使得政策制定者难以确定是否有必要通过额外的监管来解决医院身体约束的做法。