Feingold M, Gillespie B W
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029, USA.
Stat Med. 1996 May 30;15(10):953-67. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960530)15:10<953::AID-SIM213>3.0.CO;2-M.
Cross-over trials assign two or more treatments sequentially to the same subject; groups of subjects receive different treatment sequences. Both parametric and non-parametric methods of inference are available for cross-over trials with complete data. In this paper we develop methods for estimation and testing in cross-over trials with censored data, based partly on methods used for complete data. Our estimator is consistent for the true effects. Simulation results show that both of our proposed tests have approximately nominal size. We compare our procedures to a method for cross-over designs based on Cox regression proposed by France, Lewis and Kay. We demonstrate that our method of estimation is superior to the Cox-based method, which has considerable bias. Both of the tests presented here have more power than the Cox-based tests in all of the situations we investigated. The estimation and test procedures apply to other designs, such as parallel trials and repeated measures designs.
交叉试验将两种或更多种治疗方法依次分配给同一受试者;受试者组接受不同的治疗顺序。对于具有完整数据的交叉试验,参数和非参数推断方法均可用。在本文中,我们部分基于用于完整数据的方法,开发了用于具有删失数据的交叉试验的估计和检验方法。我们的估计量对于真实效应是一致的。模拟结果表明,我们提出的两个检验都具有近似的名义检验水平。我们将我们的方法与法国、刘易斯和凯提出的基于Cox回归的交叉设计方法进行比较。我们证明,我们的估计方法优于基于Cox的方法,后者存在相当大的偏差。在我们研究的所有情况下,这里提出的两个检验都比基于Cox的检验具有更大的功效。估计和检验程序适用于其他设计,如平行试验和重复测量设计。