• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[日本癌症流行病学研究的近期趋势——一位流行病学家的个人经历与观点]

[Recent trends of epidemiological studies on cancer in Japan--personal experience and view of an epidemiologist].

作者信息

Tominaga S

机构信息

Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1996 Jul;51(2):551-7. doi: 10.1265/jjh.51.551.

DOI:10.1265/jjh.51.551
PMID:8783872
Abstract

As the number of cancer deaths has increased, the number of cancer researchers including cancer epidemiologists has increased. Compared to the approaching methods of epidemiologic studies on cardiovascular diseases, those of cancer epidemiology are different. In cancer epidemiology a case-control study has been used most frequently, while in cardiovascular disease epidemiology a cross-sectional study with health examinations in a defined population has been used most frequently. In the latter study a cross-sectional study has been repeated periodically forming a cohort study in a model area. Only few large scale cohort studies on cancer had been conducted previously, but in recent years several large scale cohort studies on cancer have been conducted by several research groups. In recent years there is a trend that epidemiologists in cancer, cardiovascular diseases and other related areas collaborate in conducting a large scale cohort study. Chemoprevention studies on cancer have been initiated by cancer epidemiologists in recent years.

摘要

随着癌症死亡人数的增加,包括癌症流行病学家在内的癌症研究人员数量也在增加。与心血管疾病流行病学研究采用的方法相比,癌症流行病学的方法有所不同。在癌症流行病学中,病例对照研究使用最为频繁,而在心血管疾病流行病学中,在特定人群中进行健康检查的横断面研究使用最为频繁。在后一种研究中,横断面研究定期重复进行,在一个示范地区形成了队列研究。此前仅有少数关于癌症的大规模队列研究,但近年来,几个研究小组开展了几项关于癌症的大规模队列研究。近年来,癌症、心血管疾病及其他相关领域的流行病学家合作开展大规模队列研究呈一种趋势。近年来,癌症流行病学家已经启动了癌症化学预防研究。

相似文献

1
[Recent trends of epidemiological studies on cancer in Japan--personal experience and view of an epidemiologist].[日本癌症流行病学研究的近期趋势——一位流行病学家的个人经历与观点]
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1996 Jul;51(2):551-7. doi: 10.1265/jjh.51.551.
2
The role of epidemiology in cancer prevention.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1997 Nov;216(2):142-50. doi: 10.3181/00379727-216-44164.
3
[Role of population-based cancer registry in cancer epidemiology--epidemiological studies in the Cancer Registration Scheme in Osaka, Japan].[基于人群的癌症登记在癌症流行病学中的作用——日本大阪癌症登记计划中的流行病学研究]
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1994 Jun;49(2):543-58. doi: 10.1265/jjh.49.543.
4
Research activities of cancer epidemiology in Japan.日本癌症流行病学的研究活动。
J Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;6(3 Suppl):S19-29. doi: 10.2188/jea.6.3sup_19.
5
Recent progress and future direction of cancer epidemiological research in Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun;45(6):509-12. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv015. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
6
Contribution to promoting cancer epidemiology in Japan and to the activities of the UICC and others in cancer epidemiology and prevention.对促进日本癌症流行病学以及对国际抗癌联盟(UICC)等在癌症流行病学与预防方面活动的贡献。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 2001 Jul;92(7):719-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2001.tb01153.x.
7
Epidemiology's continuing contribution to public health: The power of "Then and Now".流行病学对公共卫生的持续贡献:“过去与现在”的力量。
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr 15;181(8):e1-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv043. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
8
Report by the Research Committee of the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture on evaluation of risk factors for cancer.教育、科学、体育和文化部研究委员会关于癌症风险因素评估的报告。
J Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;6(3 Suppl):S107-13. doi: 10.2188/jea.6.3sup_107.
9
[Studies on evaluation of risk factors of cancer by a large-scale cohort study newly organized in Japan--planning and pilot study].[日本新组织的大规模队列研究对癌症风险因素的评估研究——规划与试点研究]
Gan No Rinsho. 1990 Feb;Spec No:243-7.
10
Are epidemiologists becoming victims of the success of their discipline?
Soz Praventivmed. 2001;46(6):347-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01321657.