• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文拉法辛的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of venlafaxine.

作者信息

Ballenger J C

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Jun;16(3 Suppl 2):29S-35S; discussion 35S-36S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199606002-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00004714-199606002-00007
PMID:8784646
Abstract

Recent studies have shown venlafaxine to be an effective first-line agent for patients who have depression of varying severity. Two representative clinical trials to assess the efficacy of venlafaxine were reviewed: one in severely ill hospitalized patients and the other in outpatients. Efficacy was assessed using scores on several rating scales for 93 inpatients in the placebo-controlled trial and 224 outpatients in the active-control trial. Demographics and baseline scores were similar among study patients in each trial. In both trials, venlafaxine was significantly more effective than placebo. The study of inpatients demonstrated a rapid onset of antidepressant efficacy of venlafaxine and a reduction in comorbid symptoms of anxiety. In the study of outpatients, anticholinergic side effects commonly associated with tricyclic antidepressants such as imipramine were not found to be associated with venlafaxine, although some nausea occurred. Results of these clinical studies confirm those of previous studies that have shown venlafaxine to be an effective first-line agent for the management of depression in both hospitalized patients and outpatients.

摘要

最近的研究表明,文拉法辛对不同严重程度的抑郁症患者是一种有效的一线治疗药物。本文回顾了两项评估文拉法辛疗效的代表性临床试验:一项针对重症住院患者,另一项针对门诊患者。在安慰剂对照试验中,对93名住院患者使用几种评定量表的评分来评估疗效;在活性对照试验中,对224名门诊患者进行评估。每项试验中研究患者的人口统计学特征和基线评分相似。在两项试验中,文拉法辛均比安慰剂显著更有效。住院患者的研究表明,文拉法辛的抗抑郁疗效起效迅速,且共病焦虑症状有所减轻。在门诊患者的研究中,未发现与三环类抗抑郁药(如丙咪嗪)常见的抗胆碱能副作用与文拉法辛有关,尽管出现了一些恶心症状。这些临床研究结果证实了先前研究的结果,即文拉法辛是治疗住院患者和门诊患者抑郁症的有效一线药物。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of venlafaxine.文拉法辛的临床评估。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Jun;16(3 Suppl 2):29S-35S; discussion 35S-36S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199606002-00007.
2
The use of venlafaxine in the treatment of major depression and major depression associated with anxiety: a dose-response study. Venlafaxine Investigator Study Group.文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症及伴焦虑的重度抑郁症:一项剂量反应研究。文拉法辛研究者研究小组。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998 Feb;18(1):19-25. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199802000-00004.
3
Venlafaxine extended release versus citalopram in patients with depression unresponsive to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.对于对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂无反应的抑郁症患者,文拉法辛缓释剂与西酞普兰的对比研究
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;23(3):113-9. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f424c2.
4
Efficacy of once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) for symptoms of anxiety in depressed outpatients.每日一次的文拉法辛缓释剂(XR)治疗门诊抑郁症患者焦虑症状的疗效。
J Affect Disord. 1998 Jan;47(1-3):55-62. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00109-2.
5
Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR.双盲、安慰剂对照比较安非他酮 XR 和文拉法辛 XR 的抗抑郁疗效和耐受性。
J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;24(8):1209-16. doi: 10.1177/0269881109106953. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
6
A double-blind comparison of escitalopram and venlafaxine extended release in the treatment of major depressive disorder.艾司西酞普兰与文拉法辛缓释剂治疗重度抑郁症的双盲对照研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;65(9):1190-6. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0906.
7
The effect of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and placebo in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis.文拉法辛与其他抗抑郁药及安慰剂相比治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;259(3):172-85. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-0849-0. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants: a meta-analysis.文拉法辛与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂及其他抗抑郁药相比的疗效和耐受性:一项荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 May;180:396-404. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.5.396.
9
Randomized, double-blind comparison of venlafaxine and fluoxetine in outpatients with major depression.文拉法辛与氟西汀治疗门诊重性抑郁症的随机双盲对照研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Jul;59(7):352-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v59n0703.
10
Venlafaxine: a novel antidepressant that has a dual mechanism of action.文拉法辛:一种具有双重作用机制的新型抗抑郁药。
Depression. 1996;4(2):48-56. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7162(1996)4:2<48::AID-DEPR2>3.0.CO;2-B.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Neuropsychiatric Drugs on the Oxidation-Reduction Balance in Therapy.神经精神类药物治疗对氧化还原平衡的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 3;25(13):7304. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137304.
2
Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the prevention of relapse of depression: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.重复经颅磁刺激预防抑郁症复发的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Oct 17;14:338. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-338.
3
Duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2007 Apr;3(2):193-209. doi: 10.2147/nedt.2007.3.2.193.
4
Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.初始严重程度与抗抑郁药疗效:对提交给美国食品药品监督管理局的数据进行的荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e45. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045.
5
Anxiety and Depression: Optimizing Treatments.焦虑与抑郁:优化治疗方案
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;2(3):71-79. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v02n0301.
6
Psychiatric and Somatic Markers of Anxiety: Identification and Pharmacologic Treatment.焦虑症的精神和躯体标志物:识别与药物治疗
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;2(2):49-54. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v02n0204.