• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在高温下于营养丰富的培养基上短期培养透析液会低估微生物污染情况。

Culture of dialysis fluids on nutrient-rich media for short periods at elevated temperatures underestimate microbial contamination.

作者信息

Pass T, Wright R, Sharp B, Harding G B

机构信息

Water Testing Laboratory, Morehead State University, Ky 40351, USA.

出版信息

Blood Purif. 1996;14(2):136-45. doi: 10.1159/000170255.

DOI:10.1159/000170255
PMID:8785029
Abstract

Recommended culture methods for monitoring bacterial contamination of H2O, dialysate and bicarbonate concentrate in dialysis centers in the USA involves culturing these fluids for 48 h at 37 degrees C. A variety of media and commercial culture methods are accepted for monitoring these fluids. Over a 3-month a comparison was made between an acceptable culture method, tryptic soy agar (TSA) employing the pour plate (PP) technique at 37 degrees C for 48 h, and PP cultures on standard methods agar (SMA) and R2A agar, incubated at ambient temperature (23 degrees C) for 48, 72, 168 h. Increases in the colony counts over time occurred for all three fluids. However, counts wee greater on SMA and R2A than on TSA. The increases over the standard 48-hour TSA cultures ranged as high as 10(4) times for 23 degrees C cultures at 7 days of incubation. Endotoxin levels even in the most contaminated samples were found to be below the acceptable 5 EU/ml recommended for reprocessor water. Bacterial colonies that appeared at 48, 72 and 168 h were isolated and identified. Pseudomonas, Moraxella, Acinetobacter and CDC group VI C-2 were among some of the common bacteria isolated. This study indicates that the media utilized, the time and temperature of incubation may result in a significant underestimation of the bacterial population of water and dialysis fluids, thus potentially placing the patient at a higher risk.

摘要

美国透析中心监测水、透析液和碳酸氢盐浓缩液细菌污染的推荐培养方法是将这些液体在37摄氏度下培养48小时。多种培养基和商业培养方法可用于监测这些液体。在3个月的时间里,对一种可接受的培养方法进行了比较,即采用倾注平板(PP)技术在37摄氏度下培养48小时的胰蛋白胨大豆琼脂(TSA),以及在标准方法琼脂(SMA)和R2A琼脂上进行的PP培养,在环境温度(23摄氏度)下培养48、72、168小时。所有三种液体的菌落计数均随时间增加。然而,SMA和R2A上的计数高于TSA。在23摄氏度培养7天的情况下,与标准的48小时TSA培养相比,增加幅度高达10(4)倍。即使在污染最严重的样本中,内毒素水平也低于再处理用水推荐的可接受的5 EU/ml。对在48、72和168小时出现的细菌菌落进行了分离和鉴定。分离出的常见细菌包括假单胞菌、莫拉菌、不动杆菌和疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)VI C-2组。这项研究表明,所使用的培养基、培养时间和温度可能会导致对水和透析液中细菌数量的显著低估,从而可能使患者面临更高的风险。

相似文献

1
Culture of dialysis fluids on nutrient-rich media for short periods at elevated temperatures underestimate microbial contamination.在高温下于营养丰富的培养基上短期培养透析液会低估微生物污染情况。
Blood Purif. 1996;14(2):136-45. doi: 10.1159/000170255.
2
Improved bacteriological surveillance of haemodialysis fluids: a comparison between Tryptic soy agar and Reasoner's 2A media.血液透析液细菌学监测的改进:胰蛋白胨大豆琼脂培养基与罗森塔尔2A培养基的比较
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999 Oct;14(10):2433-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/14.10.2433.
3
Bacteriology of hemodialysis fluids: are current methodologies meaningful?血液透析液的细菌学:当前方法是否有意义?
Artif Organs. 1992 Oct;16(5):448-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1992.tb00322.x.
4
Effects of incubation time and temperature on microbiologic sampling procedures for hemodialysis fluids.孵育时间和温度对血液透析液微生物采样程序的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jul;29(7):1462-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.7.1462-1465.1991.
5
Comparison of different culture methods on bacterial recovery in hemodialysis fluids.不同培养方法对血液透析液中细菌回收率的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Nov;87(11):1361-7.
6
Bacterial contamination of hemodialysis center water and dialysate: are current assays adequate?血液透析中心水和透析液的细菌污染:当前的检测方法是否足够?
Artif Organs. 1989 Apr;13(2):155-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1989.tb02851.x.
7
Heterotrophic plate count methodology in the United States.美国的异养平板计数方法。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 May 1;92(3):307-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.08.008.
8
Microbial and endotoxin contamination in water and dialysate in the central United States.美国中部地区水和透析液中的微生物及内毒素污染
Artif Organs. 1990 Apr;14(2):85-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1990.tb01601.x.
9
A prospective study of pyrogenic reactions in hemodialysis patients using bicarbonate dialysis fluids filtered to remove bacteria and endotoxin.一项关于使用经过过滤以去除细菌和内毒素的碳酸氢盐透析液的血液透析患者发热反应的前瞻性研究。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1992 Oct;3(4):1002-7. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V341002.
10
Comparison of microbiologic assay methods for hemodialysis fluids.血液透析液微生物检测方法的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Mar;29(3):592-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.592-594.1991.

引用本文的文献

1
Pseudo-outbreak of haemodiafiltration dialysis fluid contamination: results of a detailed epidemiologic investigation.血液透析滤过透析液污染的假性暴发:详细流行病学调查结果
Infect Prev Pract. 2023 Jun 14;5(3):100292. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100292. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Hemodialysis and water quality.血液透析与水质
Semin Dial. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):427-38. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12113.
3
Water quality in conventional and home haemodialysis.常规血液透析和家庭血液透析中的水质。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012 Dec;8(12):725-34. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2012.241. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
4
Renal replacement therapy review: past, present and future.肾脏替代治疗综述:过去、现在和未来。
Organogenesis. 2011 Jan-Mar;7(1):2-12. doi: 10.4161/org.7.1.13997. Epub 2011 Jan 1.