Snooks H A, Nicholl J P, Brazier J E, Lees-Mlanga S
Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield.
J Public Health Med. 1996 Mar;18(1):67-77. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024465.
Following the introduction of Helicopter Emergency Ambulance Services (HEAS) in the United Kingdom in the last ten years this paper examines the costs and benefits of three contrasting services in Cornwall, London and Sussex.
Pre-hospital processes of care were compared between helicopter attended patients and land ambulance patients in all three studies, and health outcomes were compared between helicopter and land ambulance patients in the Cornwall and London studies. A review of the literature on the benefits of HEAS has also been undertaken.
There were no improvements in response times and the time on scene was longer for helicopter attended patients. Survival of trauma or cardiac patients attended by helicopter was not improved. In London there was some evidence of worse residual disability in helicopter attended survivors, but in Cornwall residual disability was better in helicopter attended patients. There was no improvement in general health status or aspects of daily living in the helicopter attended patients. The overall total operational costs for these services were [symbol: see text] 55 000 p.a. in Sussex, [symbol: see text] 600 000 in Cornwall and [symbol: see text] 1.2 million in London.
The analysis suggests that Helicopter Emergency Ambulance Services are costly, the health benefits are small, and there are limited circumstances in which the pre-hospital performance of an ambulance service in England and Wales can be improved.
在过去十年英国引入直升机紧急救护服务(HEAS)之后,本文研究了康沃尔、伦敦和苏塞克斯三种不同服务的成本与效益。
在所有三项研究中,对直升机救护患者和陆地救护车患者的院前护理流程进行了比较,在康沃尔和伦敦的研究中,对直升机和陆地救护车患者的健康结局进行了比较。还对有关HEAS效益的文献进行了综述。
响应时间没有改善,直升机救护患者的现场停留时间更长。直升机救护的创伤或心脏病患者的存活率没有提高。在伦敦,有证据表明直升机救护的幸存者存在更严重的残余残疾,但在康沃尔,直升机救护患者的残余残疾情况更好。直升机救护患者的总体健康状况或日常生活方面没有改善。这些服务的总体运营成本在苏塞克斯每年为5.5万英镑,在康沃尔为60万英镑,在伦敦为120万英镑。
分析表明,直升机紧急救护服务成本高昂,健康效益微小,在英格兰和威尔士,能够改善院前救护服务表现的情况有限。