Suppr超能文献

拉塞尔与伯奇的3R原则及生物制品检测

The three Rs of Russell & Burch and the testing of biological products.

作者信息

Balls M, Straughan D W

机构信息

European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM), JRC Environment Institute, Ispra, Italy.

出版信息

Dev Biol Stand. 1996;86:11-8.

PMID:8785939
Abstract

The principles of humane animal experimentation proposed by Russell & Burch (1959), namely, replacement, reduction, and refinement, are now commonly known as the Three Rs. These principles are clearly embodied in Article 7 of Directive 86/609/EEC. It is instructive, therefore, to consider the priority currently attached to compliance with these principles and to the Directive in the development and control of biological products. Specific comments are made on the need for the application of the Three Rs in relation to the testing of human diphtheria and tetanus vaccines, human pertussis vaccine, inactivated veterinary Gumboro vaccine, veterinary Newcastle disease vaccine, veterinary clostridial vaccines and botulinum toxin. We pose three questions: a. Are the minimum numbers of animals already being used in this area? b. Is any unnecessary pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm being inflicted on the animals used? and c. What could and should be done about any shortcomings in current practice? Finally, the role of ECVAM in the promotion of the Three Rs within the European Union will be reviewed.

摘要

罗素和伯奇(1959年)提出的人道动物实验原则,即替代、减少和优化,如今通常被称为“3R原则”。这些原则在86/609/EEC号指令第7条中得到了明确体现。因此,考虑在生物制品的研发和管控中当前对遵守这些原则及该指令的重视程度具有指导意义。针对在人用白喉和破伤风疫苗、人用百日咳疫苗、兽用灭活甘保罗疫苗、兽用新城疫疫苗、兽用梭菌疫苗及肉毒杆菌毒素检测中应用“3R原则”的必要性给出了具体评论。我们提出三个问题:a. 该领域目前是否已使用了最少数量的动物?b. 所用动物是否遭受了任何不必要的疼痛、痛苦、不适或持久伤害?c. 针对当前做法中的任何不足之处能够且应该做些什么?最后,将对欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)在欧盟范围内推广“3R原则”方面所起的作用进行回顾。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验