van der Ark A, van Straaten-van de Kappelle I, Hendriksen C, van de Donk H
Laboratory for Control of Biological Products, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Dev Biol Stand. 1996;86:271-81.
The current potency test for pertussis vaccines, the intracerebral protection test (MPT), is still the only mandatory laboratory model available. This test, however, is a valid, but inhumane and imprecise test and therefore a good candidate for replacement. Recently we have developed the Pertussis Serological Potency Test (PSPT) as an alternative for the MPT. The PSPT is based on in vitro assessment of the humoral immune response against the whole range of surface -antigens of B. pertussis in mice after immunisation with Whole Cell Vaccine (WCV). We have demonstrated a relationship between the mean pertussis antibody concentration at the day of challenge and the proportion of surviving mice at each vaccine dose in the MPT (R = 0.91). The PSPT is a model in which mice (20-24 g) are immunised i.p. with graded doses of vaccine and bled after four weeks. Sera are titrated in a whole cell ELISA and potency based on the vaccine dose-dependent antibody response is estimated by means of a parallel line analysis. In an in-house validation study 13 WCVs were tested in the PSPT and MPT. Homogeneity of both tests was proven by means of the chi-square test; potencies were significantly similar (p = 0.95). Compared to the MPT, the PSPT is more reproducible as is indicated by its smaller 95% confidence intervals. Moreover, by using the PSPT the animal distress can be reduced to an acceptable level and the PSPT also results in a reduction of more than 25% in use of mice. Additional experiments showed that estimation of WCV-potency in the PSPT based on specific antibody responses against protective antigens (PT, FHA, 69- and 92-kDa OMPS) was not possible or did not correlate with protection in MPT. Sera obtained from the PSPT showed a correlation between pertussis antibody levels and complement-mediated killing by pertussis antibodies in in vitro assays. In conclusion, the PSPT is a promising substitute for the MPT though further validation and additional studies on functional validity should finally warrant replacement of the MPT by this serological model.
目前百日咳疫苗的效力测试,即脑内保护试验(MPT),仍然是唯一可用的强制实验室模型。然而,该试验是一种有效但不人道且不精确的试验,因此是一个很好的可被替代的对象。最近我们开发了百日咳血清学效力试验(PSPT)作为MPT的替代方法。PSPT基于用全细胞疫苗(WCV)免疫小鼠后,对针对百日咳博德特氏菌全系列表面抗原的体液免疫反应进行体外评估。我们已经证明在MPT中,攻毒当天的平均百日咳抗体浓度与每种疫苗剂量下存活小鼠的比例之间存在相关性(R = 0.91)。PSPT是一种模型,其中体重20 - 24克的小鼠经腹腔注射不同剂量的疫苗,四周后采血。血清在全细胞ELISA中进行滴定,并通过平行线分析根据疫苗剂量依赖性抗体反应估计效力。在一项内部验证研究中,对13种WCV进行了PSPT和MPT测试。通过卡方检验证明了两种测试的同质性;效力显著相似(p = 0.95)。与MPT相比,PSPT的重现性更高,其95%置信区间更小就表明了这一点。此外,使用PSPT可将动物痛苦降低到可接受水平,并且PSPT还使小鼠使用量减少了超过25%。额外的实验表明,基于针对保护性抗原(PT、FHA、69 kDa和92 kDa外膜蛋白)的特异性抗体反应在PSPT中估计WCV效力是不可能的,或者与MPT中的保护作用不相关。从PSPT获得的血清在体外试验中显示百日咳抗体水平与百日咳抗体介导的补体杀伤之间存在相关性。总之,PSPT是MPT的一个有前景的替代方法,不过最终还需要进一步验证和关于功能有效性的更多研究,以确保这个血清学模型能够替代MPT。