Hayes D F
Breast Evaluation Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Recent Results Cancer Res. 1996;140:101-13. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-79278-6_12.
Many circulating markers have been proposed for breast cancer, with potential utility for identification, screening, prognosis, detection, or monitoring. Of the available markers, those with the greatest promise include circulating tumor markers that provide an indication of clinical course, such as CA15-3 and CEA, and novel markers such as BrCa1, antibodies to p53, antibodies to HER-2/neu, indicators of angiogenesis, and the extracellular domain of HER-2/neu. However, the precise clinical utilities of all of these markers have yet to be determined. It is especially important that the relative independence of the markers in relation to other available markers be determined so as to avoid the unnecessary cost and expense of redundancy. Moreover, it is important that the clinician be aware of the limitations in both sensitivity and specificity of each marker so as not to over- or under-interpret the predictive value of any test.
许多循环标志物已被提出用于乳腺癌,在识别、筛查、预后、检测或监测方面具有潜在用途。在现有的标志物中,最有前景的包括能提示临床病程的循环肿瘤标志物,如CA15-3和癌胚抗原(CEA),以及新型标志物,如乳腺癌1号基因(BrCa1)、p53抗体、HER-2/neu抗体、血管生成指标和HER-2/neu细胞外结构域。然而,所有这些标志物的确切临床用途尚未确定。特别重要的是,要确定这些标志物相对于其他现有标志物的相对独立性,以避免冗余带来的不必要成本和费用。此外,临床医生必须了解每个标志物在敏感性和特异性方面的局限性,以免过度或错误解读任何检测的预测价值。