Clerget-Darpoux F, Babron M C, Bickeböller H
INSERM U155, Paris, France.
Genet Epidemiol. 1995;12(6):583-8. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370120610.
The aim of this study is to compare the power of the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) to that of the identity-by-descent (IBD) distribution test. The relative powers of these tests depend both on the underlying genetic model and on the available family data. Families with two affected sibs are always more informative than those with one affected child and one unaffected child. The IBD test is always more powerful in the first situation and, contrary to the TDT, is independent of the presence of gametic disequilibrium. When there is strong linkage disequilibrium, the TDT can be more powerful than the IBD test. In that case, linkage can be detected by the TDT even in families with only one affected child.
本研究的目的是比较传递不平衡检验(TDT)与基于血缘相同(IBD)分布检验的效能。这些检验的相对效能既取决于潜在的遗传模型,也取决于可用的家系数据。有两个患病同胞的家系总是比有一个患病孩子和一个未患病孩子的家系提供更多信息。IBD检验在第一种情况下总是更具效能,并且与TDT不同,它与配子不平衡的存在无关。当存在强连锁不平衡时,TDT可能比IBD检验更具效能。在这种情况下,即使在只有一个患病孩子的家系中,TDT也能检测到连锁。