• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最小弃血量:外周血细胞比容的准确分析

The minimum discard volume: accurate analysis of peripheral hematocrit.

作者信息

Yucha C B, DeAngelo E

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, USA.

出版信息

J Intraven Nurs. 1996 May-Jun;19(3):141-6.

PMID:8788832
Abstract

The purpose of this research is to quantify the minimum amount of blood that must be discarded from an indwelling peripheral intravenous catheter (deadspace 0.5 ml) to obtain an accurate hematocrit reading. Repeat blood sampling from nine subjects is used to develop a mathematical model (Michaelis-Menten curve) describing the mixing of the flush solution and the blood. This model is used to estimate the hematocrit when different volumes are discarded. Differences between the computed hematocrit and true hematocrit were determined for each subject. When 1.5 ml (three times the deadspace volume) is discarded, the 95% confidence interval is within 0.6% of the true hematocrit.

摘要

本研究的目的是量化必须从留置外周静脉导管(死腔为0.5毫升)中弃去的最少血量,以获得准确的血细胞比容读数。对九名受试者进行重复采血,以建立一个描述冲洗液与血液混合情况的数学模型(米氏曲线)。该模型用于估计弃去不同体积血液后的血细胞比容。确定了每个受试者计算得到的血细胞比容与真实血细胞比容之间的差异。当弃去1.5毫升(死腔体积的三倍)血液时,95%置信区间在真实血细胞比容的0.6%以内。

相似文献

1
The minimum discard volume: accurate analysis of peripheral hematocrit.最小弃血量:外周血细胞比容的准确分析
J Intraven Nurs. 1996 May-Jun;19(3):141-6.
2
A discard volume of twice the deadspace ensures clinically accurate arterial blood gases and electrolytes and prevents unnecessary blood loss.两倍死腔量的弃血体积可确保临床准确的动脉血气和电解质检测结果,并防止不必要的失血。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun;31(6):1654-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000063448.98777.EF.
3
Accuracy of drawing coagulation samples from heparinized arterial lines.从肝素化动脉导管采集凝血样本的准确性。
Am J Crit Care. 1993 Jan;2(1):88-95.
4
Obtaining blood samples for coagulation studies from a normal saline lock.从生理盐水留置针采集血样用于凝血研究。
Am J Crit Care. 1999 Jul;8(4):250-3.
5
Discard volumes necessary for clinically useful coagulation studies from heparinized Hickman catheters.从肝素化的希克曼导管中丢弃临床有用的凝血研究所需的血量。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 May;23(4):671-5.
6
Comparison of PT and aPTT values drawn by venipuncture and arterial line using three discard volumes.使用三种弃血体积比较经静脉穿刺和动脉留置导管采集的PT和活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)值。
Am J Crit Care. 1992 Nov;1(3):94-101.
7
Reliability of an intravenous intermittent access port (saline lock) for obtaining blood samples for coagulation studies.用于凝血研究采血的静脉间歇性接入端口(生理盐水锁)的可靠性。
Am J Crit Care. 1999 Sep;8(5):344-8.
8
A study to determine the minimum volume of blood necessary to be discarded from a central venous catheter before a valid sample is obtained in children with cancer.一项确定癌症患儿在获取有效样本前需从中心静脉导管丢弃的最低血量的研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;48(7):687-95. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20873.
9
Quantifying the minimum discard sample required for accurate arterial blood gases.量化准确测定动脉血气所需的最小弃血样本量。
Nurs Res. 1989 Sep-Oct;38(5):276-9.
10
The reliability of blood sampling from peripheral intravenous infusion lines. Complete blood cell counts, electrolyte panels, and survey panels.经外周静脉输液管路采血的可靠性。全血细胞计数、电解质分析及多项生化指标检测。
J Intraven Nurs. 1998 Jul-Aug;21(4):209-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood sampled from existing peripheral IV cannulae yields results equivalent to venepuncture: a systematic review.从现有外周静脉留置针采集的血液样本产生的结果与静脉穿刺相当:一项系统评价。
JRSM Open. 2020 May 6;11(5):2054270419894817. doi: 10.1177/2054270419894817. eCollection 2020 May.
2
Determining optimal waste volume from an intravenous catheter.确定静脉导管的最佳废液量。
J Infus Nurs. 2013 Mar-Apr;36(2):92-6. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e318282a4c2.
3
Evaluation of the VIA Blood Chemistry Monitor for Glucose in Healthy and Diabetic Volunteers.
在健康和糖尿病志愿者中对VIA血液化学监测仪进行血糖评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Mar;2(2):182-93. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200203.