Zaidi A K, Reller L B
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27704, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Feb;34(2):352-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.2.352-354.1996.
Endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) from mechanically ventilated pediatric patients frequently are cultured as part of an evaluation for suspected sepsis. There are now well-defined criteria for rejecting low-yield ETAs from adults, but it is uncertain whether the same criteria can be applied to ETAs from children. Therefore, we compared the Gram stain and culture results for 361 consecutive ETA specimens collected from pediatric patients over a 1-year period. Results for patients for whom a blood culture was performed within 48 h of the time that a culture of ETA was performed were also reviewed. Gram stains were examined under x100 magnification to quantitate the number of polymorphonuclear neutrophils and squamous epithelial cells (SECs) per low-power field and under x1,000 magnification for the presence of organisms. No organisms were seen by Gram staining in 225 (62%) of the ETAs. Culture of these specimens rarely yielded useful information: 52% were sterile, 32% grew rare to 1+ quantities of expected respiratory flora only, 12% grew rare to 1+ quantities of gram-negative rods mixed with expected respiratory flora, and only 10 (4%) yielded a pure or predominant growth of a potential respiratory pathogen. Unlike adult patients, we did not find the number of SECs to be a useful screening criterion. Only 17 (5%) of the ETAs had greater than 10 SECs per low-power field, and 5 (29%) of these yielded pure growth of a gram-negative rod. When blood culture results were positive, they correlated with ETA culture results in only 6 of 10 cases. On the basis of our findings, the absence of organisms on Gram staining is a useful criterion for rejecting ETAs from pediatric patients for culture and would have excluded 62% of the specimens from further processing.
机械通气的儿科患者的气管内吸出物(ETA)经常作为疑似脓毒症评估的一部分进行培养。目前已有明确的标准来排除成人低产量的ETA,但不确定相同的标准是否适用于儿童的ETA。因此,我们比较了在1年期间从儿科患者收集的361份连续ETA标本的革兰氏染色和培养结果。还回顾了在ETA培养后48小时内进行血培养的患者的结果。革兰氏染色在100倍放大倍数下检查,以定量每个低倍视野中的多形核中性粒细胞和鳞状上皮细胞(SEC)数量,并在1000倍放大倍数下检查是否存在微生物。在225份(62%)的ETA中,革兰氏染色未发现微生物。这些标本的培养很少产生有用信息:52%无菌,32%仅生长出少量至1+数量的预期呼吸道菌群,12%生长出少量至1+数量的革兰氏阴性杆菌与预期呼吸道菌群混合,只有10份(4%)产生了潜在呼吸道病原体的纯培养或优势生长。与成人患者不同,我们没有发现SEC数量是一个有用的筛查标准。只有17份(5%)的ETA每个低倍视野中的SEC超过10个,其中5份(29%)产生了革兰氏阴性杆菌的纯培养。当血培养结果为阳性时,在10例中只有6例与ETA培养结果相关。根据我们的研究结果,革兰氏染色未发现微生物是排除儿科患者ETA进行培养的有用标准,这将排除62%的标本进行进一步处理。