Morgan J E, Ellingham R B, Young R D, Trmal G J
Bristol Eye Hospital, England.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1996 Sep;114(9):1110-5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140312010.
To quantify the biomechanical properties of the capsulotomy edge following continuous-tear circular capsulorhexis (CTCC) or radiofrequency (RF) diathermy capsulotomy.
A test apparatus was constructed that allowed controlled stretching of capsulotomy edges following CTCC or RF diathermy capsulotomy. The lens contents were removed by phacoemulsification to permit the implantation of probes that exerted a test force on the capsulotomy edge and were moved in diametrically opposite directions using computer-controlled stepping motors. The magnitude of the force was measured during the capsule stretch, which allowed precise determination of the degree of capsular distention at the time of capsular rupture. Selected capsular edges were subsequently examined by scanning electron microscopy.
The capsulotomy edge produced by CTCC was significantly stronger (P < .001) than that following RF. The mean (+/-SD) force to achieve capsule rupture was 0.15 +/- 0.06 N with CTCC compared with 0.02 +/- 0.01 N with RF. The mean (+/-SD) increase in the capsulotomy circumference was significantly greater with CTCC at 53% +/- 14.5% compared with RF at 18% +/- 8.5% (P < .001). Scanning electron microscopy disclosed a smooth edge for the CTCC capsulotomy. In contrast, multiple irregularities were seen in the edge following RF.
Continuous-tear circular capsulorhexis provides a stronger capsulotomy and is the preferred method in routine cataract surgery. However, RF diathermy capsulotomy may have a useful role in conditions unfavorable to the safe completion of CTCC.
量化连续环形撕囊(CTCC)或射频(RF)透热法撕囊术后撕囊边缘的生物力学特性。
构建了一种测试装置,可在CTCC或RF透热法撕囊术后对撕囊边缘进行可控拉伸。通过超声乳化术去除晶状体内容物,以便植入能对撕囊边缘施加测试力的探针,并使用计算机控制的步进电机沿直径方向相反移动。在囊膜拉伸过程中测量力的大小,从而精确确定囊膜破裂时的囊膜扩张程度。随后对选定的囊膜边缘进行扫描电子显微镜检查。
CTCC产生的撕囊边缘明显比RF撕囊边缘更强(P <.001)。CTCC导致囊膜破裂的平均(±标准差)力为0.15±0.06 N,而RF为0.02±0.01 N。CTCC导致的撕囊周长平均(±标准差)增加显著大于RF,分别为53%±14.5%和18%±8.5%(P <.001)。扫描电子显微镜显示CTCC撕囊边缘光滑。相比之下,RF撕囊边缘可见多处不规则。
连续环形撕囊提供更强的撕囊效果,是常规白内障手术的首选方法。然而,RF透热法撕囊在不利于安全完成CTCC的情况下可能具有有用的作用。