Foster R D, Anthony J P, Singer M I, Kaplan M J, Pogrel M A, Mathes S J
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, USA.
Arch Surg. 1996 Sep;131(9):960-5; discussion 965-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430210058011.
To establish a treatment algorithm for reconstructing complex midfacial defects.
Retrospective case series.
University-based teaching hospital.
Thirty-one consecutive patients were treated from 1991 through 1995. The 18 males and 13 females were aged 15 to 90 years (mean age, 58 years). The cause of the defect included neoplasm (n = 27) and trauma (n = 4). Reconstruction consisted of 1 of 4 free flaps: rectus abdominis, radial forearm, fibula, or latissimus dorsi. Aesthetic and functional results were determined by patient questionnaires and physical examinations.
Length of stay, postoperative morbidity and mortality, degree of aesthetic and functional restoration, and detection of tumor recurrence.
Twenty-seven (87%) of the 31 patients underwent reconstruction with a single major procedure. All of the flaps survived. Postoperative hospital stays averaged 14 days. Late tumor recurrence occurred in 7 (23%) of the 31 patients and was promptly detected. Aesthetic and functional results were rated good or excellent in 77% (24/31) and 87% (27/31) of patients, respectively. Of the 20 patients who underwent alveolar ridge resection, 16 (80%) received dental rehabilitation, 44% of whom received osseointegrated implants into either a bone flap or remaining native bone. Osseointegrated implants were inset during the initial reconstruction 57% (4/7 patients) of the time.
For complex midfacial defects, free-flap transfer can be performed with a high degree of success, restoring both appearance and function in most patients. The only instance in which bone is necessary to reconstruct the midface involves those areas in which osseointegrated implants are needed, ie, alveolar ridge (dental implant) and/or orbit (ocular prosthesis). In such cases, the fibula osteocutaneous free flap is the flap of choice. Otherwise, soft-tissue flaps are selected based on wound size.
建立一种用于重建复杂面部中部缺损的治疗方案。
回顾性病例系列研究。
大学附属医院。
1991年至1995年连续治疗的31例患者。其中男性18例,女性13例,年龄15至90岁(平均年龄58岁)。缺损原因包括肿瘤(27例)和外伤(4例)。重建采用以下4种游离皮瓣之一:腹直肌皮瓣、桡侧前臂皮瓣、腓骨皮瓣或背阔肌皮瓣。通过患者问卷和体格检查确定美学和功能结果。
住院时间、术后发病率和死亡率、美学和功能恢复程度以及肿瘤复发的检测。
31例患者中有27例(87%)接受了单次主要手术重建。所有皮瓣均存活。术后平均住院时间为14天。31例患者中有7例(23%)发生晚期肿瘤复发,且均被及时发现。美学和功能结果分别在77%(24/31)和87%(27/31)的患者中被评为良好或优秀。在接受牙槽嵴切除的20例患者中,16例(80%)接受了牙齿修复,其中44%的患者在骨瓣或剩余的天然骨中植入了骨整合种植体。骨整合种植体在初始重建时植入的比例为57%(4/7例患者)。
对于复杂的面部中部缺损,游离皮瓣移植可取得高度成功,在大多数患者中恢复外观和功能。重建面部中部唯一需要骨组织的情况是需要骨整合种植体的区域,即牙槽嵴(牙种植体)和/或眼眶(眼假体)。在这种情况下,腓骨骨皮瓣是首选皮瓣。否则,根据伤口大小选择软组织皮瓣。