Suppr超能文献

非洛地平或氢氯噻嗪/氨苯蝶啶治疗老年人高血压:对血压、高血压性心脏病、代谢及激素参数的影响

Felodipine or hydrochlorothiazide/triamterene for treatment of hypertension in the elderly: effects on blood pressure, hypertensive heart disease, metabolic and hormonal parameters.

作者信息

Trenkwalder P, Plaschke M, Aulehner R, Lydtin H

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Starnberg Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Blood Press. 1996 May;5(3):154-63. doi: 10.3109/08037059609062124.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of either felodipine or the diuretic combination hydrochlorothiazide/triamterene in a group (n = 65) of elderly (> or = 70 years) hypertensives (office blood pressure > or = 160/95 mmHg) with special regard to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, hypertensive heart disease and metabolic parameters. This was a randomized, double-blind study with a treatment period of 6 months. Reduction of office and 24-hr ambulatory blood pressure was comparable with both treatment regimens; after 6 months. 18 of 29 patients in the felodipine group (62%) and 20 of 27 patients in the diuretic group (74%; p = 0.4) were controlled. While episodes of ischemic type ST-segment depression were significantly reduced in the felodipine group (from 49 to 9 episodes), there was no significant change in the diuretic group (from 24 to 21 episodes). Both regimens decreased left ventricular wall thickness, but the decline in left ventricular muscle mass index was significant only for felodipine. Felodipine did not induce any change in metabolic or hormonal parameters; the diuretic combination significantly increased serum creatinine, uric acid, plasma renin activity, and plasma prorenin. Thus, the antihypertensive efficacy of felodipine and the diuretic combination was comparable in elderly hypertensives; only felodipine, however, improved parameters of hypertensive heart disease and showed a neutral metabolic and hormonal profile.

摘要

本研究旨在比较非洛地平与利尿剂组合氢氯噻嗪/氨苯蝶啶在一组(n = 65)老年(≥70岁)高血压患者(诊室血压≥160/95 mmHg)中的降压疗效,特别关注动态血压监测、高血压性心脏病和代谢参数。这是一项随机、双盲研究,治疗期为6个月。两种治疗方案在降低诊室血压和24小时动态血压方面具有可比性;6个月后,非洛地平组29例患者中有18例(62%)血压得到控制,利尿剂组27例患者中有20例(74%;p = 0.4)血压得到控制。虽然非洛地平组缺血型ST段压低发作次数显著减少(从49次降至9次),但利尿剂组无显著变化(从24次降至21次)。两种治疗方案均降低了左心室壁厚度,但仅非洛地平使左心室肌肉质量指数显著下降。非洛地平未引起代谢或激素参数的任何变化;利尿剂组合显著增加了血清肌酐、尿酸、血浆肾素活性和血浆前肾素。因此,非洛地平和利尿剂组合在老年高血压患者中的降压疗效相当;然而,只有非洛地平改善了高血压性心脏病的参数,并显示出中性的代谢和激素特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验