Suppr超能文献

非洛地平缓释片与传统利尿剂疗法治疗老年患者收缩期高血压的比较。国家试验组。

Felodipine extended release versus conventional diuretic therapy for the treatment of systolic hypertension in elderly patients. The National Trial Group.

作者信息

McClennen W, Wilson T

机构信息

Astra Canada, Mississauga, Ont.

出版信息

Clin Invest Med. 1998 Jun;21(3):142-50.

PMID:9627768
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare 8 weeks of monotherapy using either felodipine extended release (ER) or a conventional diuretic therapy, triamterene/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), in elderly patients with systolic hypertension.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, single-blind screening, double-blind treatment, parallel group comparison.

SETTING

Twenty-nine general and family practice sites across Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Men and post-menopausal women aged 60 to 85 years, with mild to moderate primary systolic hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 160 mm Hg or blood pressure > 140/ > 90 mm Hg).

INTERVENTIONS

Daily doses of either felodipine ER (2.5 mg) or triamterene/HCTZ (25/12.5 mg) for 8 weeks. After the first 4 weeks, the patients who responded to the initial dosage (a reduction in systolic blood pressure of at least 15 mm Hg) or whose blood pressure was controlled on the dosage (systolic blood pressure < 140 mm Hg) continued to take the low dose. Among the others, the daily doses were doubled for the final 4 weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Systolic blood pressure before beginning treatment and at the end of the study, as well as adverse events and results of heart rate measurement, clinical chemistry tests, electrocardiograms and physical examinations before and after therapy.

RESULTS

Sufficient data for analysis were obtained from 216 patients (86 men and 130 women). Mean seated blood pressure was reduced significantly in both the felodipine group (from 168/91 to 151/84 mm Hg) and the diuretic group (from 168/92 to 147/84 mm Hg). The difference in mean reductions in systolic blood pressure between the groups was 2.2 mm Hg (with a 95% confidence interval of-1.7 to 6.0 mm Hg), which was not significant. Clinical chemistry measurements taken before treatment and at the end of the study showed that more patients in the diuretic group developed abnormal values for blood urea nitrogen, uric acid and creatinine. Other changes were unremarkable. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups, but more patients in the felodipine group (9) than in the diuretic group (3) discontinued treatment owing to an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Felodipine ER (2.5 to 5 mg daily) is as effective in reducing systolic blood pressure as triamterene/HCTZ (25/12.5 mg to 50/25 mg daily). More patients discontinued felodipine treatment than triamterene/HCTZ treatment owing to adverse events. However, patients receiving triamterene/HCTZ tended to have abnormal levels in clinical chemistry tests; these should be monitored.

摘要

目的

比较老年收缩期高血压患者使用非洛地平缓释片(ER)单药治疗8周与传统利尿剂治疗(氨苯蝶啶/氢氯噻嗪,HCTZ)的疗效。

设计

前瞻性、随机、单盲筛查、双盲治疗、平行组对照。

地点

加拿大全国29个综合及家庭医疗点。

参与者

年龄在60至85岁的男性及绝经后女性,患有轻度至中度原发性收缩期高血压(收缩压>160 mmHg或血压>140/>90 mmHg)。

干预措施

每日服用非洛地平ER(2.5 mg)或氨苯蝶啶/HCTZ(25/12.5 mg),持续8周。在最初4周后,对初始剂量有反应(收缩压至少降低15 mmHg)或血压在该剂量下得到控制(收缩压<140 mmHg)的患者继续服用低剂量药物。其他患者在最后4周将每日剂量加倍。

观察指标

治疗开始前及研究结束时的收缩压,以及不良事件、心率测量结果、治疗前后的临床化学检测、心电图和体格检查结果。

结果

从216名患者(86名男性和130名女性)获得了足够的分析数据。非洛地平组(从168/91降至151/84 mmHg)和利尿剂组(从168/92降至147/84 mmHg)的平均坐位血压均显著降低。两组收缩压平均降低值的差异为2.2 mmHg(95%置信区间为-1.7至6.0 mmHg),无显著差异。治疗前及研究结束时的临床化学检测显示,利尿剂组更多患者的血尿素氮、尿酸和肌酐值异常。其他变化不明显。两组不良事件发生率相似,但因不良事件停止治疗的非洛地平组患者(9名)多于利尿剂组(3名)。

结论

非洛地平ER(每日2.5至5 mg)在降低收缩压方面与氨苯蝶啶/HCTZ(每日25/12.5 mg至50/25 mg)效果相当。因不良事件停止非洛地平治疗的患者多于氨苯蝶啶/HCTZ治疗的患者。然而,接受氨苯蝶啶/HCTZ治疗的患者临床化学检测结果往往异常,应予以监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验