Castell D O, Richter J E, Robinson M, Sontag S J, Haber M M
Graduate Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Sep;91(9):1749-57.
This study was designed to compare lansoprazole 30 mg, lansoprazole 15 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, and placebo in the treatment of erosive reflux esophagitis.
In a double-blind, multicenter study, 1284 patients with endoscopically diagnosed erosive reflux esophagitis were randomized to received lansoprazole 30 mg (n = 422), lansoprazole 15 mg (n = 218), omeprazole 20 mg (n = 431), or placebo (n = 213) once daily for 8 wk. At 2, 4, 6, and 8 wk, healing was evaluated endoscopically. Patients kept daily diaries of symptoms.
Healing rates at 2, 4, 6, and 8 wk were 65.3%, 83.3%, 89.4%, and 90.0%, respectively, for lansoprazole 30 mg; 56.3%, 74.6%, 80.3%, and 78.8% for lansoprazole 15 mg; 60.9%, 82.0%, 89.7%, and 90.7% for omeprazole 20 mg; and 23.9%, 32.8%, 36.6%, and 40.0% for placebo (all active treatments higher than placebo, p < 0.001). Healing rates with lansoprazole 30 mg were significantly higher than with lansoprazole 15 mg at all time points (p < 0.05). Healing rates with omeprazole 20 mg were significantly higher than with lansoprazole 15 mg at 4, 6, and 8 wk and were similar to those with lansoprazole 30 mg. Based on patient diaries, lansoprazole 30 mg produced better symptomatic relief than lansoprazole 15 mg or omeprazole 20 mg, primarily early in the treatment course.
Both lansoprazole 30 mg and omeprazole 20 mg were more effective than lansoprazole 15 mg in esophageal mucosal healing. Compared with omeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg was as safe, was similarly effective with respect to esophageal healing, and provided superior symptomatic relief, primarily early in treatment. Lansoprazole 30 mg provided greater symptomatic relief than lansoprazole 15 mg.
本研究旨在比较兰索拉唑30毫克、兰索拉唑15毫克、奥美拉唑20毫克和安慰剂治疗糜烂性反流性食管炎的效果。
在一项双盲、多中心研究中,1284例经内镜诊断为糜烂性反流性食管炎的患者被随机分为接受兰索拉唑30毫克(n = 422)、兰索拉唑15毫克(n = 218)、奥美拉唑20毫克(n = 431)或安慰剂(n = 213),每日一次,持续8周。在第2、4、6和8周时,通过内镜评估愈合情况。患者记录每日症状日记。
兰索拉唑30毫克组在第2、4、6和8周的愈合率分别为65.3%、83.3%、89.4%和90.0%;兰索拉唑15毫克组分别为56.3%、74.6%、80.3%和78.8%;奥美拉唑20毫克组分别为60.9%、82.0%、89.7%和90.7%;安慰剂组分别为23.9%、32.8%、36.6%和40.0%(所有活性治疗组均高于安慰剂组,p < 0.001)。兰索拉唑30毫克组在所有时间点的愈合率均显著高于兰索拉唑15毫克组(p < 0.05)。奥美拉唑20毫克组在第4、6和8周的愈合率显著高于兰索拉唑15毫克组,且与兰索拉唑30毫克组相似。根据患者日记,兰索拉唑30毫克在症状缓解方面比兰索拉唑15毫克或奥美拉唑20毫克更好,主要在治疗早期。
兰索拉唑30毫克和奥美拉唑20毫克在食管黏膜愈合方面均比兰索拉唑15毫克更有效。与奥美拉唑20毫克相比,兰索拉唑30毫克同样安全,在食管愈合方面效果相似,且在症状缓解方面更优,主要在治疗早期。兰索拉唑30毫克在症状缓解方面比兰索拉唑15毫克更显著。