Sontag S J, Kogut D G, Fleischmann R, Campbell D R, Richter J, Robinson M, McFarland M, Sabesin S, Lehman G A, Castell D
Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Mar;92(3):429-37.
We conducted a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial to determine whether lansoprazole was superior to continued therapy with histamine H2-receptor antagonist therapy in healing erosive reflux esophagitis.
Investigators from nine medical centers enrolled 159 patients with endoscopically documented esophageal erosions and/or ulcers that had failed to heal with 12 or more wk of at least standard dosages of histamine H2-receptor antagonist therapy. Patients received ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. for 8 wk or lansoprazole 30 mg for 4 wk followed by either lansoprazole 30 mg or lansoprazole 60 mg for another 4 wk of treatment. Patients underwent endoscopy at screening and at weeks 2, 4, and 8.
At 2, 4, and 8 wk of therapy, healing rates were significantly higher in the lansoprazole group compared with the ranitidine group (p < 0.001). By 8 wk, 84% of the lansoprazole group were healed as opposed to only 32% of the ranitidine group. Lansoprazole was superior to ranitidine in providing relief of upper abdominal burning and daytime heartburn (p < 0.001) and reducing the need for antacids (p < 0.001). Lansoprazole patients had less interference with sleep and less day time drowsiness than ranitidine patients (p = 0.05). The percentages of patients with adverse events were similar in both groups. Fasting serum gastrin levels at weeks 4 and 8 were significantly higher in the lansoprazole group compared with the ranitidine group.
Eight weeks of lansoprazole therapy is safe, superior to continued ranitidine therapy, and effective in healing more than 80% of patients with erosive reflux esophagitis previously resistant to histamine H2-receptor antagonist therapy.
我们开展了一项随机、双盲、多中心临床试验,以确定兰索拉唑在愈合糜烂性反流性食管炎方面是否优于继续使用组胺H2受体拮抗剂治疗。
来自九个医学中心的研究人员招募了159例经内镜检查证实有食管糜烂和/或溃疡且至少接受12周或更长时间至少标准剂量组胺H2受体拮抗剂治疗但未愈合的患者。患者接受雷尼替丁150毫克,每日两次,共8周,或兰索拉唑30毫克,共4周,随后再接受兰索拉唑30毫克或兰索拉唑60毫克治疗4周。患者在筛查时以及第2、4和8周接受内镜检查。
在治疗的第2、4和8周,兰索拉唑组的愈合率显著高于雷尼替丁组(p < 0.001)。到第8周时,兰索拉唑组84%的患者愈合,而雷尼替丁组仅为32%。在缓解上腹部烧灼感和白天烧心方面,兰索拉唑优于雷尼替丁(p < 0.001),且减少了使用抗酸剂的需求(p < 0.001)。与雷尼替丁患者相比,兰索拉唑患者对睡眠的干扰更小,白天嗜睡情况更少(p = 0.05)。两组不良事件患者的百分比相似。与雷尼替丁组相比,兰索拉唑组在第4周和第8周时的空腹血清胃泌素水平显著更高。
八周的兰索拉唑治疗是安全的,优于继续使用雷尼替丁治疗,并且能有效治愈超过80%先前对组胺H2受体拮抗剂治疗耐药的糜烂性反流性食管炎患者。