Baurain M J, Dernovoi B S, D'Hollander A A, Hennart D A, Cantraine F R
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 May;40(5):574-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04490.x.
Since neostigmine was introduced for reversal of neuromuscular block, there has been controversy about the optimum dose for antagonizing neuromuscular block. The purpose of this study was to characterise recovery of neuromuscular transmission following a vecuronium-induced block 15 min after neostigmine administration using different stimulation patterns, and to determine the effects of different doses of neostigmine given at various pre-reversal twitch heights.
Adductor pollicis (AP) mechanical activity in response to low (0.1 and 2 Hz) and high (50 and 100 Hz) frequency stimulation, was recorded 15 min after 20, 40 and 80 micrograms/kg neostigmine, given to reverse a vecuronium-induced block at 10, 25 and 50% pre-reversal twitch height (TH). Fifty four ASA class I and II anaesthetised (methohexital, fentanyl, N2O/O2) young adult patients were studied and randomly allocated into 9 groups of 6 patients each.
In contrast to twitch height (TH) and residual force after 50 Hz, 5 s tetanic stimulation (RF50Hz), the greater sensitivity of train-of-four (TOF) ratio and residual force after 100 Hz, 5 s tetanic stimulation (RF100Hz) points out the best reversal conditions (prereversal TH and the optimal neostigmine dose) (P < 0.001, two-way analysis of variance). The highest reversal scores (about 0.9 TOF ratio and RF100Hz) were obtained when 40 micrograms/kg of neostigmine was given at 25 and 50% TH. A 0.9 TOF ratio was also observed when 40 micrograms/kg of neostigmine was given at 10% TH, but, under these conditions, RF100Hz was only 0.6 (P < 0.05, Duncan test).
To optimise the reversal action of neostigmine in order to obtain the highest neuromuscular transmission recovery (0.9 TOF ratio and RF100Hz) during a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block, the 40 micrograms/kg dose has to be given at 25 to 50% recovery of TH.
自从新斯的明被用于逆转神经肌肉阻滞以来,关于拮抗神经肌肉阻滞的最佳剂量一直存在争议。本研究的目的是使用不同的刺激模式,描述新斯的明给药15分钟后维库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞之后神经肌肉传递的恢复情况,并确定在不同的逆转前颤搐高度给予不同剂量新斯的明的效果。
在给予20、40和80微克/千克新斯的明以逆转维库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞,逆转前颤搐高度分别为10%、25%和50%后15分钟,记录拇收肌(AP)对低频率(0.1和2赫兹)和高频率(50和100赫兹)刺激的机械活动。研究了54例ASA I级和II级麻醉(美索比妥、芬太尼、N2O/O2)的年轻成年患者,并将其随机分为9组,每组6例。
与50赫兹、5秒强直刺激后的颤搐高度(TH)和残余肌力(RF50Hz)相比,四个成串刺激(TOF)比值以及100赫兹、5秒强直刺激后的残余肌力(RF100Hz)的更高敏感性指出了最佳的逆转条件(逆转前TH和最佳新斯的明剂量)(P<0.001,双向方差分析)。当在25%和50%TH给予40微克/千克新斯的明时,获得了最高的逆转评分(约0.9的TOF比值和RF100Hz)。当在10%TH给予40微克/千克新斯的明时,也观察到0.9的TOF比值,但在这些条件下,RF100Hz仅为0.6(P<0.05,邓肯检验)。
为了优化新斯的明的逆转作用,以便在维库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞期间获得最高的神经肌肉传递恢复(0.9的TOF比值和RF100Hz),必须在TH恢复25%至50%时给予40微克/千克的剂量。