• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Fetal ophthalmic artery blood flow velocity waveforms.

作者信息

Aoki S, Hata T, Ariyuki Y, Senoh D, Makihara K, Hata K, Kitao M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Gyohmeikan Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1996;41(4):232-6. doi: 10.1159/000292275.

DOI:10.1159/000292275
PMID:8793491
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate alterations in vascular impedance of the fetal ophthalmic artery (OA) with advancing gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

Color Doppler flow imaging and pulsed Doppler ultrasonographic assessment were performed on 28 normal fetuses, at gestational ages ranging from 21 to 40 weeks. The pulsatility index (PI) was calculated for the OA and the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Optimal models for these PI values were determined by regression analysis. A normal range of PI values for both arteries was generated.

RESULTS

In the OA, the model showed a parabolic pattern during pregnancy, as was the case for MCA. The predicted PI values for the OA were always lower than those for the MCA.

CONCLUSION

Our study is the first to demonstrate alterations in regional vascular impedance of the fetal OA with advancing gestation. These data provide a foundation for the evaluation of fetal ocular circulation in normal and abnormal pregnancies.

摘要

相似文献

1
Fetal ophthalmic artery blood flow velocity waveforms.
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1996;41(4):232-6. doi: 10.1159/000292275.
2
Longitudinal Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of alterations in regional vascular resistance of arteries in normal and growth-retarded fetuses.正常和生长受限胎儿动脉局部血管阻力变化的纵向多普勒超声评估。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995;39(3):171-9. doi: 10.1159/000292403.
3
Blood flow velocity waveforms from fetal peripheral pulmonary arteries in pregnancies with preterm premature rupture of the membranes: relationship with pulmonary hypoplasia.胎膜早破妊娠中胎儿外周肺动脉血流速度波形:与肺发育不全的关系
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Feb;15(2):98-103. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00006.x.
4
Fetal adrenal artery velocimetry measurements in appropriate-for-gestational age and intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses.适于胎龄和宫内生长受限胎儿的胎儿肾上腺动脉血流速度测定
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Oct;16(5):419-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00222.x.
5
Changes observed in Doppler studies of the fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. I. Cross-sectional analysis.子痫前期或小于胎龄儿分娩的妊娠中胎儿循环的多普勒研究中观察到的变化。I. 横断面分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;6(1):19-28. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06010019.x.
6
Color Doppler ultrasound of spiral artery blood flow for prediction of hypertensive disorders and intra uterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study.经阴道彩色多普勒超声检测子宫螺旋动脉血流预测妊娠期高血压疾病及胎儿生长受限的纵向研究
Prenat Diagn. 2007 Nov;27(11):1011-6. doi: 10.1002/pd.1822.
7
Maternal ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry in normotensive pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age infants.正常血压的妊娠期小于胎龄儿孕妇的眼动脉多普勒血流测定
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 May;11(5):328-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11050328.x.
8
Diagnosis of fetal pulmonary hypoplasia by measurement of blood flow velocity waveforms of pulmonary arteries with Doppler ultrasonography.应用多普勒超声测量肺动脉血流速度波形诊断胎儿肺发育不全
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb;180(2 Pt 1):441-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70229-2.
9
Normative values of Doppler velocimetry of five major fetal arteries as determined by color power angiography.通过彩色能量血管造影术测定的五条主要胎儿动脉多普勒测速的正常数值。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Mar;84(3):230-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00549.x.
10
Adrenal artery velocity waveforms in the appropriate and small-for-gestational-age fetus.适胎龄及小于胎龄胎儿的肾上腺动脉速度波形
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Aug;8(2):82-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.08020082.x.