Suppr超能文献

癫痫患者颞叶中与爆发性放电相关的神经元同步性

Neuronal synchrony in relation to burst discharge in epileptic human temporal lobes.

作者信息

Colder B W, Wilson C L, Frysinger R C, Chao L C, Harper R M, Engel J

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, UCLA Medical School 90024, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1996 Jun;75(6):2496-508. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.6.2496.

Abstract
  1. Synchronous interactions between neurons in mesial temporal structures of patients with complex partial seizures were studied using cross-correlation analyses. We recorded spontaneous activity from 293 neurons in 24 patients during the interictal state. Patients had depth microelectrodes chronically implanted in amygdala, hippocampal formation, and parahippocampal gyrus to record epileptic activity. One hundred twenty-five cells were recorded from the temporal lobe commonly initiating seizures (ipsilateral temporal lobe), and 168 cells from the contralateral temporal lobe. Eight hundred forty-three cross-correlograms were constructed between all pairs of simultaneously recorded neurons. Cross-correlogram peaks or troughs that exceeded confidence limits within 200 ms of the origin were considered evidence of synchronous neuronal interaction. 2. Synchronous neuronal interactions were observed in 223 of 843 cross-correlograms. Eighty-six percent of these 223 cross-correlograms showed significant central peaks (peak interactions), suggesting excitatory interactions, whereas the remainder displayed significant central troughs (trough interactions), suggesting inhibitory interactions. 3. Cross-correlograms constructed using cells from the ipsilateral temporal lobe (ipsilateral cross-correlograms) were more likely to display significant central troughs (14/262) than cross-correlograms constructed using cells from the contralateral temporal lobe (6/376; contralateral cross-correlograms). Similarly, cross-correlograms constructed using one cell from each hemisphere (11/205; bilateral cross-correlograms) were also more likely to display significant central troughs (trough interactions) than contralateral cross-correlograms. Both ipsilateral (77/262) and contralateral cross-correlograms (102/376) were more likely to display significant central peaks (peak interactions) than bilateral cross-correlograms (13/205). 4. Cells from different structures in the ipsilateral temporal lobe were more likely to display significant trough interactions (10/ 114) than neurons in different contralateral structures. We also compared the proportion of significant peak interactions between cells within the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of each structure. Neurons in the contralateral entorhinal cortex were more likely to show peak interactions (21/55) than cells from the ipsilateral entorhinal cortex (3/31). Also, cells in the ipsilateral presubiculum showed a higher proportion of peak interactions (9/16) than their contralateral homologues (5/30). 5. Neuronal burst discharges were defined as three or more action potentials (or spikes) separated by interspike intervals of < or = 30 ms, or two spikes separated by an interval of < or = 15 ms. The contribution of burst discharge to synchronous peak interaction was compared between temporal lobes. Cells used to construct ipsilateral cross-correlograms displaying significant central peaks (n = 154) were found to have significantly reduced burst discharge contributions to the observed synchronous peaks in comparison with their contralateral homologues (n = 204). When cross-correlograms were separated by regions, burst discharge contributions to synchronous peak interactions between cells in the ipsilateral hippocampus (n = 72) were significantly smaller than the contributions from cells in the contralateral hippocampus (n = 44). 6. The results suggest that in the interictal state, synchronous neuronal burst discharge is not a distinguishing feature of epileptogenic regions of patients with complex partial seizures, but inhibitory neuronal interactions are increased in regions of seizure initiation. Increases in the strength and spread of local inhibition in seizure initiating regions in these patients may result in a greater proportion of inhibitory interactions and could also cause increased synchrony between isolated action potentials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
摘要
  1. 运用交叉相关分析,对复杂部分性癫痫患者内侧颞叶结构中神经元之间的同步相互作用进行了研究。在发作间期,我们记录了24例患者293个神经元的自发活动。患者长期植入深度微电极于杏仁核、海马结构和海马旁回以记录癫痫活动。125个细胞取自通常引发癫痫发作的颞叶(同侧颞叶),168个细胞取自对侧颞叶。在所有同时记录的神经元对之间构建了843个交叉相关图。在原点200毫秒内超过置信限的交叉相关图峰值或谷值被视为同步神经元相互作用的证据。2. 在843个交叉相关图中的223个中观察到了同步神经元相互作用。这223个交叉相关图中的86%显示出显著的中心峰值(峰值相互作用),表明兴奋性相互作用,而其余的显示出显著的中心谷值(谷值相互作用),表明抑制性相互作用。3. 与使用对侧颞叶细胞构建的交叉相关图(6/376;对侧交叉相关图)相比,使用同侧颞叶细胞构建的交叉相关图(同侧交叉相关图,14/262)更有可能显示出显著的中心谷值。同样,使用每个半球一个细胞构建的交叉相关图(11/205;双侧交叉相关图)也比双侧交叉相关图更有可能显示出显著的中心谷值(谷值相互作用)。同侧交叉相关图(77/262)和对侧交叉相关图(102/376)都比双侧交叉相关图(13/205)更有可能显示出显著的中心峰值(峰值相互作用)。4. 同侧颞叶不同结构的细胞比不同对侧结构的神经元更有可能显示出显著的谷值相互作用(10/114)。我们还比较了每个结构同侧和对侧细胞之间显著峰值相互作用的比例。对侧内嗅皮层的神经元比同侧内嗅皮层的细胞更有可能显示出峰值相互作用(21/55比3/31)。此外,同侧前扣带回的细胞显示出的峰值相互作用比例(9/16)高于其对侧同源细胞(5/30)。5. 神经元爆发性放电被定义为三个或更多动作电位(或锋电位),其峰峰间期小于或等于30毫秒,或两个锋电位间隔小于或等于15毫秒。比较了颞叶之间爆发性放电对同步峰值相互作用 的贡献。发现用于构建显示显著中心峰值的同侧交叉相关图的细胞(n = 154)与它们的对侧同源细胞(n = 204)相比,对观察到的同步峰值的爆发性放电贡献显著降低。当按区域分离交叉相关图时,同侧海马细胞(n = 72)之间对同步峰值相互作用的爆发性放电贡献显著小于对侧海马细胞(n = 44)的贡献。6. 结果表明,在发作间期,同步神经元爆发性放电不是复杂部分性癫痫患者癫痫源区的一个显著特征,但在癫痫起始区域抑制性神经元相互作用增加。这些患者癫痫起始区域局部抑制的强度和范围增加可能导致抑制性相互作用的比例更大,也可能导致孤立动作电位之间的同步性增加。(摘要截断)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验