Suppr超能文献

对双盲临床试验的批判。第1部分。

A critique of the double-blind clinical trial. Part 1.

作者信息

Kiene H

机构信息

Inno Vision Communications, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA.

出版信息

Altern Ther Health Med. 1996 Jan;2(1):74-80.

PMID:8795875
Abstract

The randomized, double-blind study is generally regarded as the gold standard of clinical drug trials. Bias can occur as a result of the blinding procedure itself, but discussions of this type of bias have been few and far between. This article presents a detailed discussion of such blinding errors, which can obscure genuine drug effects and be of a sufficient magnitude as to generate false-negative results. Uncritical blinding in clinical studies should therefore be questioned.

摘要

随机双盲研究通常被视为临床药物试验的金标准。尽管由于盲法程序本身可能会产生偏倚,但关于这类偏倚的讨论却很少。本文详细讨论了此类盲法错误,这些错误可能会掩盖药物的真实效果,其严重程度足以产生假阴性结果。因此,临床研究中不加批判地采用盲法应受到质疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验