Suppr超能文献

盲人领盲人:随机对照试验中盲法的使用与误用。

The blind leading the blind: use and misuse of blinding in randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Research and Clinical Services, Sprim Advanced Life Sciences, 235 Pine Street, Suite 1175, San Francisco, CA 94104, United States.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Mar;32(2):240-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Nov 9.

Abstract

The use of blinding strengthens the credibility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by minimizing bias. However, there is confusion surrounding the definition of blinding as well as the terms single, double, and triple blind. It has been suggested that these terms should be discontinued due to their broad misinterpretation. We recommend that, instead of abandoning the use of these terms, explicit definitions of blinding should be adopted. We address herein the concept of blinding, propose standard definitions for the consistent use of these terms, and detail when different types of blinding should be utilized. Standardizing the definition of blinding and utilizing proper blinding methods will improve the quality and clarity of reporting in RCTs.

摘要

盲法的使用通过最小化偏倚来增强随机对照试验 (RCT) 的可信度。然而,盲法的定义以及单盲、双盲和三盲这些术语的含义存在混淆。有人建议由于这些术语被广泛误解,应该停止使用这些术语。我们建议,不应该放弃这些术语的使用,而应采用盲法的明确定义。本文旨在阐述盲法的概念,提出这些术语的标准定义,详细说明何时应使用不同类型的盲法。标准化盲法的定义并使用适当的盲法方法将提高 RCT 报告的质量和清晰度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验