Mazzanti M, Germano G, Kiat H, Friedman J, Berman D S
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 1996 Mar-Apr;3(2):143-9. doi: 10.1016/s1071-3581(96)90006-9.
This study assesses the feasibility of 99mTc-labeled sestamibi electrocardiographic gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with a short acquisition time (6.7 minutes, "fast" gated SPECT) for the evaluation of stress myocardial perfusion and poststress myocardial function. Simultaneous assessment of stress perfusion and poststress function is possible with standard gated SPECT acquisition (19.3 minutes) of stress-injected sestamibi. Sestamibi gated SPECT can be used to evaluate regional wall motion (RWM), thickening, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); the feasibility of fast gated SPECT has not been evaluated previously.
Fifty patients were studied who underwent treadmill exercise, sestamibi injection (25 to 30 mCi), and standard gated SPECT 15 minutes after exercise, immediately followed by fast gated SPECT. All patients underwent rest 201Tl SPECT before exercise testing. All studies were analyzed by semiquantitative visual scoring. Both standard and fast gated SPECT were read for stress perfusion and poststress wall motion and thickening, dividing the left ventricle into 20 segments, on a 5-point scale described previously. The measurement of LVEF used a previously described automatic algorithm. Average myocardial counts per pixel were 58 +/- 19 for standard gated SPECT and 13 +/- 4 for fast gated SPECT (p = 0.0001). Heart/lung ratio was 10.2 +/- 4.8 for regular gated SPECT and 10.3 +/- 5.7 for fast gated SPECT (difference not significant). Perfusion analysis showed exact agreement in 92% of the segments (kappa = 0.76; p < 0.01). Correlation between LVEFs measured from standard and fast gated SPECT was 0.94. Analysis of 998 segments (two segments were uninterpretable) showed exact agreement in 96% (kappa = 0.89; p < 0.001) for RWM and 94% (kappa = 0.83; p < 0.001) for thickening between standard and fast gated SPECT. In 225 segments with abnormal RWM and 189 segments with abnormal thickening by both standard and fast gated SPECT, exact agreements were 0.92 for RWM (kappa = 0.90; p < 0.001) and 0.87 for thickening (kappa = 0.80; p < 0.01).
Our data demonstrate that fast sestamibi gated SPECT is feasible and yields results equivalent to those of standard sestamibi gated SPECT with respect to left ventricular regional and global function.
本研究评估了采用短采集时间(6.7分钟,“快速”门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描,即SPECT)的99mTc标记的司他米比心电图门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)用于评估负荷心肌灌注及负荷后心肌功能的可行性。通过对负荷注射司他米比进行标准门控SPECT采集(19.3分钟)可同时评估负荷灌注及负荷后功能。司他米比门控SPECT可用于评估室壁运动(RWM)、增厚情况及左心室射血分数(LVEF);快速门控SPECT的可行性此前尚未得到评估。
对50例患者进行了研究,这些患者接受了平板运动、司他米比注射(25至30mCi),并在运动后15分钟进行了标准门控SPECT检查,随后立即进行快速门控SPECT检查。所有患者在运动试验前均接受了静息201Tl SPECT检查。所有研究均采用半定量视觉评分法进行分析。标准门控SPECT和快速门控SPECT均读取负荷灌注及负荷后壁运动和增厚情况,将左心室分为20个节段,采用先前描述的5分制。LVEF的测量采用先前描述的自动算法。标准门控SPECT的平均每像素心肌计数为58±19,快速门控SPECT为13±4(p = 0.0001)。常规门控SPECT的心脏/肺比值为10.2±4.8,快速门控SPECT为10.3±5.7(差异无统计学意义)。灌注分析显示92%的节段结果完全一致(kappa = 0.76;p < 0.01)。标准门控SPECT和快速门控SPECT测量的LVEF之间的相关性为0.94。对998个节段(两个节段无法解读)的分析显示,标准门控SPECT和快速门控SPECT在RWM方面96%的节段结果完全一致(kappa = 0.89;p < 0.001),在增厚情况方面94%的节段结果完全一致(kappa = 0.83;p < 0.001)。在标准门控SPECT和快速门控SPECT均显示RWM异常的225个节段以及增厚异常的189个节段中,RWM的完全一致性为0.92(kappa = 0.90;p < 0.001),增厚情况的完全一致性为0.87(kappa = 0.80;p < 0.01)。
我们的数据表明,快速司他米比门控SPECT是可行的,在左心室局部和整体功能方面产生的结果与标准司他米比门控SPECT相当。