Liu Y H, Sinusas A J, Shi C Q, Shen M Y, Dione D P, Heller E N, Wackers F J
Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 1996 Jul-Aug;3(4):312-20. doi: 10.1016/s1071-3581(96)90091-4.
Quantification of single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) images is generally based on determination of maximal counts on radial sectors of short-axis slices. We hypothesized that analysis of mean counts may reduce estimation error.
We compared quantitative 99mTc-labeled sestamibi (MIBI) SPECT based on maximal myocardial counts with that based on mean myocardial counts for accuracy of quantifying relative regional myocardial perfusion in a canine model of permanent left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion. MIBI and radiolabeled microspheres were injected during left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion. Relative microsphere myocardial blood flow was expressed as a percentage of normal (left circumflex coronary artery territory) blood flow. SPECT imaging was performed in vivo and ex vivo. Relative MIBI uptake on SPECT short-axis slices was quantified with normalized circumferential profiles based on maximal and mean counts. In vivo and ex vivo SPECT relative myocardial count density was compared to relative myocardial blood flow in six dogs. In the comparisons, percent errors in estimating the relative blood flow and relative flow deficit with MIBI SPECT imaging were calculated. There was an excellent correlation between absolute myocardial tissue MIBI activity and regional myocardial blood flow for each of the six dogs (r = 0.90 to 0.98). The correlations between relative myocardial count density on SPECT and relative blood flow for individual sectors were similar for maximal and mean count profiles (maximal, 0.79 to 0.83; mean, 0.77 to 0.82). Comparing the nadirs of in vivo and ex vivo circumferential count profiles, the correlations were slightly better (maximal, 0.82 to 0.91; mean, 0.87 to 0.91). Average percent errors in assessing relative blood flow and relative flow deficit were decreased significantly by use of mean count profiles (p < 0.05).
Relative SPECT count density with either maximal or mean count profiles correlated well with relative myocardial blood flow. Compared with maximal count profiles, quantification with mean count profiles improved estimation of relative flow.
单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)图像的定量分析通常基于短轴切片径向扇区上最大计数的测定。我们推测平均计数分析可能会减少估计误差。
在永久性左前降支冠状动脉闭塞的犬模型中,我们比较了基于最大心肌计数的定量99mTc标记的甲氧基异丁基异腈(MIBI)SPECT和基于平均心肌计数的定量99mTc标记的MIBI SPECT在量化相对局部心肌灌注准确性方面的差异。在左前降支冠状动脉闭塞期间注射MIBI和放射性标记的微球。相对微球心肌血流量表示为正常(左旋支冠状动脉区域)血流量的百分比。在体内和体外进行SPECT成像。基于最大和平均计数的归一化圆周轮廓对SPECT短轴切片上的相对MIBI摄取进行定量。将六只狗的体内和体外SPECT相对心肌计数密度与相对心肌血流量进行比较。在比较中,计算了用MIBI SPECT成像估计相对血流量和相对血流不足时的百分比误差。六只狗中的每只狗的绝对心肌组织MIBI活性与局部心肌血流量之间均存在极好的相关性(r = 0.90至0.98)。对于最大和平均计数轮廓,SPECT上相对心肌计数密度与各个扇区的相对血流量之间的相关性相似(最大,0.79至0.83;平均,0.77至0.82)。比较体内和体外圆周计数轮廓的最低点,相关性略好(最大,0.82至0.91;平均,0.87至0.91)。使用平均计数轮廓可显著降低评估相对血流量和相对血流不足时的平均百分比误差(p < 0.05)。
具有最大或平均计数轮廓的相对SPECT计数密度与相对心肌血流量密切相关。与最大计数轮廓相比,使用平均计数轮廓进行定量可改善相对血流的估计。