Glassman P, Redding S, Filler S, Chambers D W
Department of Dental Practice, University of the Pacific School of Dentistry, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
J Dent Educ. 1996 Sep;60(9):747-54.
Meeting the demand for postdoctoral general dentistry programs will require new, innovative, and flexible models. Many believe that these new models must be competency-based and focus on the outcomes of postdoctoral general dentistry training rather than on the structure and process of that training. The Section on Postdoctoral General Dentistry of the American Association of Dental Schools formed a broadly representative working group in the fall of 1994 to develop a set of competency and proficiency statements describing graduates of postdoctoral general dentistry programs. PGD program directors were then surveyed to determine the extent to which they felt these competencies matched their concepts of the PGD graduate. Between 44 and 65 competency statements that were rated highly by program directors could serve as the basis for a "core" set of statements to describe the abilities of graduates of postdoctoral general dentistry programs. These data should stimulate further discussion among educators, program directors, accrediting bodies, and government agencies about the future of postdoctoral general dentistry programs.
满足对博士后普通牙科项目的需求将需要新的、创新的和灵活的模式。许多人认为,这些新模式必须以能力为基础,并关注博士后普通牙科培训的结果,而不是该培训的结构和过程。美国牙科学校协会博士后普通牙科分会于1994年秋季成立了一个具有广泛代表性的工作组,以制定一套描述博士后普通牙科项目毕业生的能力和熟练程度的声明。然后对PGD项目主任进行了调查,以确定他们认为这些能力与他们对PGD毕业生的概念相匹配的程度。项目主任高度评价的44至65条能力声明可作为一套“核心”声明的基础,以描述博士后普通牙科项目毕业生的能力。这些数据应促使教育工作者、项目主任、认证机构和政府机构就博士后普通牙科项目的未来展开进一步讨论。