Wright L, Nielsen B A, Abbanato K R, Jackson T, Lancaster C, Son J
University of Central Oklahoma.
J Clin Psychol. 1995 Sep;51(5):610-4. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199509)51:5<610::aid-jclp2270510505>3.0.co;2-3.
The degree of association with two general health indices was assessed for three separate measures of time urgency. The Speed and Impatience subscale of the Jenkins Activity Survey was found to have no significant relationships with the health indices. The Time Urgency/Perpetual Activation (TUPA) scale, as well as the Irritability and Impatience scale, did correlate in comparable ways with a majority of the health indicators. A very brief, 2-item impatience subscale of the Irritability and Impatience Scale also correlated with health indices in essentially the same manner as the complete Irritability and Impatience Scale and the TUPA Scale. It was concluded that because of its convenience of administration, the very brief 2-item impatience subscale of the Irritability and Impatience Scale may constitute the instrument of choice for assessing time urgency as it relates to noncardiovascular health. A question is raised regarding whether anger and time urgency constitute separate factors or are aspects of a single behavioral trait.
针对三种不同的时间紧迫感测量方法，评估了其与两种一般健康指数的关联程度。结果发现，詹金斯活动调查中的速度与不耐烦分量表与健康指数无显著关系。时间紧迫感/持续激活（TUPA）量表以及易怒与不耐烦量表，与大多数健康指标的相关性方式相似。易怒与不耐烦量表中一个非常简短的、包含2个条目的不耐烦分量表，与健康指数的相关性方式与完整的易怒与不耐烦量表以及TUPA量表基本相同。得出的结论是，由于其管理方便，易怒与不耐烦量表中非常简短的、包含2个条目的不耐烦分量表可能是评估与非心血管健康相关的时间紧迫感的首选工具。有人提出一个问题，即愤怒和时间紧迫感是构成独立因素还是单一行为特征的不同方面。
