Shafik A
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.
Int Surg. 1996 Jan-Mar;81(1):83-4.
In view of the morbidity and recurrence rates associated with the various current techniques adopted for the treatment of pilonidal sinus, sinus electrocauterization (EC) was practiced in 18 patients. The results were compared with those obtained after excision operation in another 18 patients. The 2 groups were matched for age, gender and follow-up. Entry criteria comprised non-recurrent quiescent pilonidal sinus. In the EC group, the sinus tracks were laid-open, the debris removed and sinus walls cauterized. In the excision group, the sinus tracks were excised and the wound was left open. Patients were followed up for a mean of 29.6 months. Of the EC group, healing was achieved in 16 patients after the 1st cauterization and in 2 after recauterization. 15 cases of excision group were cured; sinus re-excision was performed in 3 patients in 2 of whom healing was accomplished. The technique of EC compared favourably with the other conventional techniques in terms of recurrence rate. In addition, it is simple, easy, has no complications and is performed as an outpatient procedure.
鉴于目前用于治疗藏毛窦的各种技术所涉及的发病率和复发率,对18例患者实施了窦道电灼术(EC)。将结果与另外18例接受切除手术的患者的结果进行比较。两组在年龄、性别和随访方面进行了匹配。纳入标准包括非复发性静止性藏毛窦。在EC组中,切开窦道,清除碎屑并烧灼窦壁。在切除组中,切除窦道并让伤口敞开。患者平均随访29.6个月。在EC组中,16例患者在首次烧灼后愈合,2例在再次烧灼后愈合。切除组15例治愈;3例患者进行了窦道再次切除,其中2例完成愈合。就复发率而言,EC技术与其他传统技术相比具有优势。此外,它简单易行,无并发症,可作为门诊手术进行。