Suppr超能文献

用于微生物培养的尿液采集技术评估。

Assessment of urine collection technique for microbial culture.

作者信息

Prandoni D, Boone M H, Larson E, Blane C G, Fitzpatrick H

机构信息

Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 1996 Jun;24(3):219-21. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(96)90018-8.

Abstract

Two methods of urine collection-clean catch and midstream only-were compared in 200 samples (100 with each technique). There were no significant differences between the two collection methods with regard to number of positive culture results or types and counts of organisms isolated. There is little if any added benefit to special preparation for urine collection for culture.

摘要

对200份样本(每种采集方法各100份)采用两种尿液采集方法——清洁中段尿采集法和仅留取中段尿法进行了比较。在阳性培养结果数量或分离出的微生物种类及计数方面,两种采集方法之间没有显著差异。对于用于培养的尿液采集进行特殊准备几乎没有额外益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验