Koch T
Royal District Nursing Service, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Jul;24(1):174-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.17224.x.
The thesis of this paper is that researchers working in interpretive traditions need to address three central issues: philosophy, rigour and representation. This paper discusses the process of an hermeneutic inquiry as a research methodology used in seeking to understand the experiences of older patients admitted to an acute hospital. The methodology includes the philosophical framework and assumptions underpinning the research. Philosophical hermeneutics guides the inquiry as a reflection of the research process. Three issues concerning legitimation of the hermeneutic research process arise: the philosophical underpinnings of the methodology, representation, or the participation of the researcher in making data, and rigour, or the way in which trustworthiness of hermeneutic research can be established. I recommend that Gadamer's primacy of application to the understanding of texts can also be applied to understanding of health environments. I conclude that Gadamer's post-modern sensibility regarding text and the framework of Guba & Lincoln's fourth generation evaluation are compatible within a hermeneutic inquiry.
本文的论点是,从事诠释传统研究的人员需要解决三个核心问题:哲学、严谨性和呈现方式。本文讨论了诠释学探究过程,将其作为一种研究方法,用于试图理解入住急症医院的老年患者的经历。该方法包括支撑研究的哲学框架和假设。哲学诠释学作为对研究过程的一种反思,指导着探究。关于诠释学研究过程的正当性出现了三个问题:该方法的哲学基础、呈现方式,即研究者在生成数据中的参与,以及严谨性,即如何确立诠释学研究的可信度。我建议,伽达默尔关于文本理解的应用首要性也可应用于对健康环境的理解。我得出结论,伽达默尔关于文本的后现代敏感性与古巴和林肯的第四代评价框架在诠释学探究中是兼容的。