Martin J H
Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, New York State Psychiatric Institute, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, NY 10032, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Mar;108(2):191-205. doi: 10.1007/BF00228094.
We used anterograde transport of WGA-HRP to examine the topography of corticospinal projections from the forelimb areas within the rostral and caudal motor cortex subregions in the cat. We compared the pattern of these projections with those from the somatic sensory cortex. The principal finding of this study was that the laminar distribution of projections to the contralateral gray matter from the two motor cortex subregions was different. The rostral motor cortex projected preferentially to laminae VI-VIII, whereas caudal motor cortex projected primarily to laminae IV-VI. Confirming earlier findings, somatic sensory cortex projected predominantly to laminae I-VI inclusive. We found that only rostral motor cortex projected to territories in the rostral cervical cord containing propriospinal neurons of cervical spinal segments C3-4 and, in the cervical enlargement, to portions presumed to contain Ia inhibitory interneurons. We generated contour maps of labeling probability on averaged segmental distributions of anterograde labeling for all analyzed sections using the same algorithm. For rostral motor cortex, heaviest label in the dorsal part of lamina VII in the contralateral cord was consistently located in separate medial and lateral zones. In contrast, no consistent differences in the mediolateral location of label was noted for caudal motor cortex. To summarize, laminae I-III received input only from the somatic sensory cortex, while laminae IV-V received input from both somatic sensory and caudal motor cortex. Lamina VI received input from all cortical fields examined. Laminae VII-IX received input selectively from the rostral motor cortex. For motor cortex, our findings suggest that projections from the two subregions comprise separate descending pathways that could play distinct functional roles in movement control and sensorimotor integration.
我们使用WGA-HRP顺行运输来研究猫的吻侧和尾侧运动皮层亚区内前肢区域皮质脊髓投射的拓扑结构。我们将这些投射模式与躯体感觉皮层的投射模式进行了比较。本研究的主要发现是,两个运动皮层亚区向对侧灰质的投射分层分布不同。吻侧运动皮层优先投射到VI-VIII层,而尾侧运动皮层主要投射到IV-VI层。正如早期研究结果所证实的,躯体感觉皮层主要投射到包括I-VI层在内的区域。我们发现,只有吻侧运动皮层投射到颈髓吻侧包含C3-4颈段脊髓 propriospinal神经元的区域,以及在颈膨大处,投射到推测包含Ia抑制性中间神经元的部分区域。我们使用相同的算法,在所有分析切片的顺行标记平均节段分布上生成了标记概率等高线图。对于吻侧运动皮层,对侧脊髓VII层背侧的最重标记始终位于单独的内侧和外侧区域。相比之下,尾侧运动皮层在标记的内外侧位置上没有观察到一致的差异。总之,I-III层仅接受来自躯体感觉皮层的输入,而IV-V层接受来自躯体感觉皮层和尾侧运动皮层的输入。VI层接受所有检查的皮质区域的输入。VII-IX层选择性地接受来自吻侧运动皮层的输入。对于运动皮层,我们的研究结果表明,两个亚区的投射构成了独立的下行通路,可能在运动控制和感觉运动整合中发挥不同的功能作用。