Di Silverio F, D'Eramo G, Buscarini M, Casale P, Di Nicola S, Colella D, Sciarra A
Department of Urology, University of Rome La Sapienza.
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 1995 Sep;47(3):117-24.
The efficacy of radical prostatectomy on localized prostate cancer is well documented. However if a high risk for patients suffering from prostate cancer and effectiveness of treatment would be documented, the advantage of the therapy on the natural history of the disease must be demonstrated. Johansson et al. analyzed the natural history of 223 untreated localized prostate cancer with a mean follow up of 123 months. Only 8.5% of the patients died of prostate cancer. The 10 year disease specific survival rate was 86.8%. The progression free survival rate was 53.1%. Zincke et al. reported that the disease specific survival of the T1 T2 submitted to radical prostatectomy at 15 years was 93% and the survival free of disease was 70%. Our data on localized prostate cancer submitted to radical prostatectomy showed that the disease specific survival and the progression free survival after 5 years of follow-up were 99% and 85.7% respectively. Fleming, focusing on life expectancy, demonstrated that radical prostatectomy provides some benefit compared with watchful waiting for patients younger than 70 years. The greatest marginal benefits of treatment arise when we assume higher metastatic rates and higher treatment efficacy. In fact in this case, radical prostatectomy offers 3.5 years of improvement in quality of life adjusted survival in younger patients with moderately or poorly differentiated tumors. Radical prostatectomy can particularly benefit selected groups of patients with localized prostate cancer. The grade of differentiation has been shown to be the most powerful predictor in several series. DNA ploidy and tumor volume may be other reliable prognostic factors. Among all the parameters considered, the two with greatest effect in determining the outcome of treatment compared to watchful waiting were the rate of progression to metastatic disease in untreated patients and the estimated efficacy of treatment in reducing the metastatic rate.
根治性前列腺切除术对局限性前列腺癌的疗效已有充分记录。然而,如果要记录前列腺癌患者的高风险情况以及治疗效果,就必须证明该疗法对疾病自然史的益处。约翰松等人分析了223例未经治疗的局限性前列腺癌患者的自然史,平均随访时间为123个月。只有8.5%的患者死于前列腺癌。10年疾病特异性生存率为86.8%。无进展生存率为53.1%。津克等人报告称,接受根治性前列腺切除术的T1、T2期患者15年的疾病特异性生存率为93%,无病生存率为70%。我们关于接受根治性前列腺切除术的局限性前列腺癌的数据显示,随访5年后的疾病特异性生存率和无进展生存率分别为99%和85.7%。弗莱明关注预期寿命,证明与观察等待相比,根治性前列腺切除术对70岁以下患者有一定益处。当我们假设转移率更高且治疗效果更好时,治疗的最大边际效益就会显现出来。事实上,在这种情况下,根治性前列腺切除术能使中度或低分化肿瘤的年轻患者经生活质量调整后的生存期提高3.5年。根治性前列腺切除术对特定的局限性前列腺癌患者群体尤其有益。在几个系列研究中,分化程度已被证明是最有力的预测指标。DNA倍体和肿瘤体积可能是其他可靠的预后因素。在所有考虑的参数中,与观察等待相比,对治疗结果影响最大的两个参数是未经治疗患者进展为转移性疾病的发生率以及治疗降低转移率的估计效果。