Heller J G, Estes B T, Zaouali M, Diop A
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Arts et Métiers, Paris, France.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Sep;78(9):1315-21. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199609000-00004.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the design of the screw, the depth of insertion, the vertebral level, and the quality of the host bone on the pull-out resistance of screws used in the lateral masses. The study included twelve fresh cervical spines from human cadavera. Radiographs were made of each specimen to ensure the absence of defects, and then the cancellous-bone density of the vertebral bodies was measured at each level with quantitative computed tomography scanning. Six commercially available screws of various diameters and thread configurations (2.7, 3.2, 3.5, and 4.5-millimeter cortical-bone screws; a 3.5-millimeter cancellous-bone screw; and a 3.5-millimeter self-tapping screw) that are currently used for fixation of the cervical lateral masses were tested for axial load to failure. A twelve-by-twelve Latin square design was used to randomize the screws with regard to level (second through seventh cervical vertebrae), side (right and left), and depth of insertion (unicortical or bicortical purchase). Each screw was then subjected to uniaxial load to failure. The data were analyzed to determine if the diameter of the screw, the thread configuration, the number of cortices engaged, the cervical level, or the bone density was associated with the load to failure. Three major subgroups (greatest, intermediate, and lowest pull-out resistance) were identified. The subgroup with the greatest pull-out resistance included only screws with bicortical purchase; the 3.2, 3.5, and 4.5-millimeter cortical-bone screws and the 3.5-millimeter cancellous-bone screw were in this subgroup. Regardless of the thread configuration, no screw with unicortical purchase was in the group with the greatest pull-out resistance. Two of the three values in the subgroup with the lowest pull-out resistance were for the 3.5-millimeter self-tapping screw (with unicortical or bicortical purchase). The cancellous-bone density of the vertebral body was not associated with pull-out resistance and it did not vary significantly according to the cervical level, with the numbers available. However, the pull-out resistance of the screws varied significantly (p = 0.004) by level: it was the greatest at the fourth cervical level, decreasing cephalad and caudad to that level.
本研究的目的是调查螺钉设计、植入深度、椎体节段以及宿主骨质量对用于侧块的螺钉拔出阻力的影响。该研究纳入了12个来自人类尸体的新鲜颈椎。对每个标本进行X线摄影以确保无缺陷,然后通过定量计算机断层扫描测量每个节段椎体的松质骨密度。测试了目前用于颈椎侧块固定的6种市售不同直径和螺纹结构的螺钉(2.7、3.2、3.5和4.5毫米皮质骨螺钉;1枚3.5毫米松质骨螺钉;以及1枚3.5毫米自攻螺钉)的轴向破坏载荷。采用12×12拉丁方设计,将螺钉在节段(第二至第七颈椎)、侧别(右侧和左侧)以及植入深度(单皮质或双皮质固定)方面进行随机分组。然后对每个螺钉施加单轴破坏载荷。分析数据以确定螺钉直径、螺纹结构、固定的皮质层数、颈椎节段或骨密度是否与破坏载荷相关。确定了三个主要亚组(拔出阻力最大、中等和最小)。拔出阻力最大的亚组仅包括双皮质固定的螺钉;3.2、3.5和4.5毫米皮质骨螺钉以及3.5毫米松质骨螺钉属于该亚组。无论螺纹结构如何,单皮质固定的螺钉均不在拔出阻力最大的组中。拔出阻力最小的亚组中的三个值中有两个是3.5毫米自攻螺钉(单皮质或双皮质固定)的。椎体的松质骨密度与拔出阻力无关,并且在所提供的数据中,其在不同颈椎节段之间无显著差异。然而,螺钉的拔出阻力随节段有显著变化(p = 0.004):在第四颈椎节段最大,向该节段的头侧和尾侧逐渐减小。