• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄酒香气测试——一种快速嗅觉测试

Le Nez du Vin--a quick test of olfaction.

作者信息

McMahon C, Scadding G K

机构信息

Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1996 Jun;21(3):278-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1996.tb01741.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2273.1996.tb01741.x
PMID:8818503
Abstract

There is a need for a quick and inexpensive smell identification test. A six odour multiple choice smell test derived from Le Nez du Vin, a winetaster's kit, is described. One hundred and thirty-two subjects assessed a mean of 5.28 +/- 1.18 odours correctly. There was a significant difference between those who considered themselves to have a normal sense of smell (n = 91), mean score 5.52 +/- 0.76, and those who thought themselves hyposmic (n = 41), mean score 4.76 +/- 1.68. (P < 0.001). No significant differences could be detected between the scores of smokers and non-smokers, nor those of males and females. Twenty-one patients performed both the Nez du Vin and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) in random order. Results of the two tests showed good correlation (r = 0.79, P < 0.001).

摘要

需要一种快速且廉价的气味识别测试。本文描述了一种源自品酒师工具包“Le Nez du Vin”的六种气味多项选择嗅觉测试。132名受试者正确评估的气味平均为5.28±1.18种。自认为嗅觉正常的受试者(n = 91)平均得分5.52±0.76,自认为嗅觉减退的受试者(n = 41)平均得分4.76±1.68,两者之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。吸烟者与非吸烟者之间、男性与女性之间的得分未发现显著差异。21名患者以随机顺序进行了“Le Nez du Vin”测试和宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT)。两项测试结果显示出良好的相关性(r = 0.79,P < 0.001)。

相似文献

1
Le Nez du Vin--a quick test of olfaction.葡萄酒香气测试——一种快速嗅觉测试
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1996 Jun;21(3):278-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1996.tb01741.x.
2
Development of Taiwan Smell Identification Test: a quick office-based smell screening test for Taiwanese.台湾嗅觉识别测试的开发:一种针对台湾人的基于办公室的快速嗅觉筛查测试。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(2):e50-4. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4174.
3
Cross-culturally modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for a Turkish population.针对土耳其人群对宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试进行跨文化修改。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):e138-41. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4212.
4
Comparing the accuracy of different smell identification tests in Parkinson's disease: relevance of cultural aspects.比较帕金森病中不同嗅觉识别测试的准确性:文化因素的相关性。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;123:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.04.030. Epub 2014 May 10.
5
The candy smell test: a new test for retronasal olfactory performance.糖果气味测试:一种用于鼻后嗅觉功能的新测试。
Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):487-95. doi: 10.1002/lary.20123.
6
Outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery: olfaction, nose scale and quality of life in a prospective cohort study.内窥镜鼻窦手术的结果:一项前瞻性队列研究中的嗅觉、鼻评分和生活质量
Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Dec;41(6):798-803. doi: 10.1111/coa.12665. Epub 2016 May 26.
7
The combined olfactory test in a Chinese population.中国人群中的联合嗅觉测试。
J Laryngol Otol. 2006 Feb;120(2):113-6. doi: 10.1017/S0022215105003889. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
8
The effect of laser assisted uvulopalatoplasty on the sense of smell and taste.激光辅助悬雍垂腭咽成形术对嗅觉和味觉的影响。
Rhinology. 2001 Jun;39(2):103-6.
9
A pilot study of a traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for application in Taiwan.一项宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试中文版在台湾应用的初步研究。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 Jan-Feb;24(1):45-50. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3388.
10
The Middle Turbinate Resection and Its Repercussion in Olfaction with the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT).中鼻甲切除术及其对嗅觉的影响:基于宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT)的研究
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;22(3):280-283. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608679. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital adaptation of odor identification test: Current knowledge, gaps, and initial insights from a DAC global cohort.嗅觉识别测试的数字适应性:DAC全球队列的当前知识、差距和初步见解
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2025 Aug 18;9:25424823251362132. doi: 10.1177/25424823251362132. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Rapid Degradation of the Human ACE2 Receptor Upon Binding and Internalization of SARS-Cov-2-Spike-RBD Protein.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2刺突蛋白受体结合域(SARS-CoV-2-Spike-RBD)蛋白结合并内化后,人血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)受体迅速降解。
bioRxiv. 2024 Mar 8:2024.03.07.583884. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.07.583884.
3
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.
国际过敏与鼻科学学会共识声明:嗅觉。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Apr;12(4):327-680. doi: 10.1002/alr.22929.
4
A retrospective study on long-term efficacy of intranasal lysine-aspirin in controlling NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease.鼻腔内赖氨酸阿司匹林治疗 NSAID 加重性呼吸道疾病的长期疗效的回顾性研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 May;279(5):2473-2484. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07063-2. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
5
Loss of smell in COVID-19 patients: a critical review with emphasis on the use of olfactory tests.新冠病毒感染患者的嗅觉丧失:一项重点关注嗅觉测试应用的批判性综述
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2020 Aug;40(4):241-247. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N0862.
6
Olfactory disorders in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a systematic literature review.2019冠状病毒病患者的嗅觉障碍:一项系统文献综述
J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Sep 15:1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0022215120002005.
7
Audit of nasal lysine aspirin therapy in recalcitrant aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease.顽固性阿司匹林加重的呼吸道疾病中鼻内赖氨酸阿司匹林治疗的审核。
World Allergy Organ J. 2014 Jul 29;7(1):18. doi: 10.1186/1939-4551-7-18. eCollection 2014.
8
Human olfactory sensitivity for bourgeonal and male infertility: a preliminary investigation.人体对苯甲醛和男性不育的嗅觉敏感性:初步研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;270(12):3079-86. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2441-0. Epub 2013 Mar 24.
9
Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper.鼻科学诊断工具。EAACI 立场文件。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2011 Jun 10;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-1-2.
10
Anosmia associated with hearing loss and benign positional vertigo after head trauma.头部创伤后与听力损失和良性阵发性位置性眩晕相关的嗅觉丧失。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2009 Oct;29(5):270-3.