• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

善意带来回报:开胸术后肋间神经阻滞的医学益处。

Kindness pays dividends: the medical benefits of intercostal nerve block following thoracotomy.

作者信息

Fleming W H, Sarafian L B

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977 Aug;74(2):273-4.

PMID:881880
Abstract

Postoperative pain is an important factor in the management of children undergoing thoracotomy. Intercostal nerve block has been used in adult patients, but its applicability in the pediatric age group has not been previously evaluated. Eighty-nine children (85 girls and 31 boys) aged 6 months to 16 years (mean age 4.7 years) underwent ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) through a left thoracotomy. Twenty-nine children received intercostal blocks with bupivacaine from the level of the second to sixth thoracic vertebrae. Sixty cases constituted the control group. The patients with intercostal block had fewer doses of pain medication postoperatively, 2.7 mean (0 to 9), than did the control patients, 3.9 mean (0 to 21). The mean hospital stay was shortened in the patients with nerve block, 5.1 days versus 7.3 days for the control group. No ill effects of bupivacaine were noted. We conclude that intercostal nerve block is a valuable procedure reducing the need for postoperative analgesia and shortening hospital stay.

摘要

术后疼痛是小儿开胸手术管理中的一个重要因素。肋间神经阻滞已应用于成年患者,但此前尚未评估其在儿童年龄组中的适用性。89名年龄在6个月至16岁(平均年龄4.7岁)的儿童(85名女孩和31名男孩)通过左胸切口接受动脉导管未闭(PDA)结扎术。29名儿童接受了从第二至第六胸椎水平的布比卡因肋间阻滞。60例为对照组。接受肋间阻滞的患者术后使用止痛药物的剂量较少,平均为2.7次(0至9次),而对照组患者平均为3.9次(0至21次)。神经阻滞患者的平均住院时间缩短,为5.1天,而对照组为7.3天。未观察到布比卡因的不良影响。我们得出结论,肋间神经阻滞是一种有价值的方法,可减少术后镇痛需求并缩短住院时间。

相似文献

1
Kindness pays dividends: the medical benefits of intercostal nerve block following thoracotomy.善意带来回报:开胸术后肋间神经阻滞的医学益处。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977 Aug;74(2):273-4.
2
Repetitive intercostal nerve block via catheter for postoperative pain relief after thoracotomy.经导管重复肋间神经阻滞用于开胸术后疼痛缓解
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Oct;37(5):273-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1020331.
3
[Pain therapy after thoracotomies--systemic patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioid versus intercostal block and interpleural analgesia].开胸术后的疼痛治疗——阿片类药物的全身性患者自控镇痛(PCA)与肋间神经阻滞及胸膜间镇痛的比较
Anaesthesiol Reanim. 1997;22(6):159-63.
4
Intercostal nerve block with Bupivacaine for post-thoracotomy pain relief in children.布比卡因肋间神经阻滞用于儿童开胸术后疼痛缓解
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Aug;11(4):219-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17148.
5
Complications of intercostal nerve blocks performed under direct vision during thoracotomy: a report of two cases.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983 Oct;86(4):628-30.
6
Intercostal catheter analgesia is more efficient vs. intercostal nerve blockade for post-thoracotomy pain relief.对于开胸术后的疼痛缓解,肋间导管镇痛比肋间神经阻滞更有效。
Coll Antropol. 2007 Jun;31(2):561-6.
7
[Analgesic effect of 0.25% marcaine in intercostal nerve block after cholecystectomy].[0.25% 布比卡因在胆囊切除术后肋间神经阻滞中的镇痛效果]
Wiad Lek. 1984 Jul 1;37(13):985-9.
8
Intrapleural bupivacaine for early post-thoracotomy analgesia--comparison with bupivacaine intercostal block and cryofreezing.胸膜腔内注射布比卡因用于开胸术后早期镇痛——与布比卡因肋间阻滞及冷冻疗法的比较
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990 Feb;38(1):38-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1013989.
9
Efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine and extrapleural intercostal nerve block on post-thoracotomy pain. A prospective, randomized study.酮咯酸氨丁三醇与胸膜外肋间神经阻滞对开胸术后疼痛的疗效。一项前瞻性随机研究。
Int Surg. 1996 Jul-Sep;81(3):224-8.
10
Comparison of epidural analgesia and intercostal nerve cryoanalgesia for post-thoracotomy pain control.开胸术后疼痛控制中硬膜外镇痛与肋间神经冷冻镇痛的比较。
Eur J Pain. 2008 Apr;12(3):378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.07.011. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-thoracotomy analgesia.开胸术后镇痛
Saudi J Anaesth. 2021 Jul-Sep;15(3):341-347. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_743_20. Epub 2021 Jun 19.