Mahler D B, Engle J H, Simms L E, Terkla L G
Department of Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Dentistry, Portland 97201-3097, USA.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1996 Mar;127(3):345-9, quiz 391. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0204.
Using one selected amalgam bonding agent, the authors evaluated bonded and unbonded restorations in clinical service. Based on postoperative sensitivity one to two weeks after placement and marginal fracture at one year, no difference was found between the bonded and unbonded restorations. Furthermore, some technical difficulties were experienced with use of the bonding agent.
作者使用一种选定的汞合金粘结剂，对临床使用中的粘结修复体和未粘结修复体进行了评估。根据修复体放置后一到两周的术后敏感性以及一年后的边缘折裂情况，粘结修复体和未粘结修复体之间未发现差异。此外，在使用粘结剂时遇到了一些技术难题。
